2026-01-02 05:25:12

Brothers participating in the trading competition, listen up. You must think this through: since you're going to boost trading volume, just go ahead and boost it more. After all, you're already paying the transaction fees. Spending a bit more on fees to wear down the system is really no big deal. If you successfully make it through the trading competition, you'll have already earned back those fees, your score will still be high, and the airdrop won't be less. This is a guaranteed winning situation. But what if you don't make it in the end? Then it gets a bit awkward — you'll still spend the fees, and although your score increases by one point, the corresponding airdrop is only about thirty U.S. dollars, which isn't very practical. This becomes a lose-lose strategy. So, before participating, you need to do the math and avoid blindly increasing your efforts.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ZKProofEnthusiast

· 9h ago

Basically, it's a gambler's mentality— the more fees you burn, the harder it is to break even.

View OriginalReply0

GlueGuy

· 9h ago

Honestly, this logic is as flawed as a sieve. If you don't make a profit, it's purely a loss. The airdrop of thirty U's can't even cover the cost.

View OriginalReply0

NFTragedy

· 10h ago

That's right, this is the gambler's mentality... Once the fee is paid, it can't be recovered. Airdropping thirty U really results in a huge loss. Trying to push in but ending up wasting more money, it's not worth it, buddy. This kind of gameplay is too risky; it's better to stay rational and do the math. Hey, has anyone calculated the actual ROI? It seems like many people are blindly rushing in. Instead of chasing short-term explosive gains, it's better to participate steadily and not get caught in the trap. I've seen enough of these competitions; it's always a few people making money while the majority pay tuition. Basically, it's a probability game, and the fee is always a clear loss.

View OriginalReply0

NFTRegretful

· 10h ago

To be honest, this logical loophole is a bit big, I'm just worried everyone might get tricked.

View OriginalReply0

MetaMuskRat

· 10h ago

That's right, I've seen too many people blindly pile up trading volume, only to end up losing everything. --- The most terrifying thing is getting overly excited during the race, with fees piling up, and ending up not even in the top ten, which is embarrassing. --- Instead of blindly spending on fees, it's better to calculate the returns clearly; that's the prudent way to play. --- I've heard too many stories of heavy losses, all because they didn't figure out this one calculation. --- Honestly, airdrops of thirty U are not even more than the fees; no matter how you calculate it, it's not worth it. --- My strategy is to steadily increase volume, don't think about going all-in; those who end up losing money are always the aggressive ones. --- That's how the competition is; the more envy there is, the more everyone becomes like a leek, we need to stay calm. --- The three-loss strategy does exist, but most people can't see it clearly and are still blindly increasing their bets.

View OriginalReply0

BrokeBeans