Recently, observing the market trends has led to a clear realization: the crypto market is undergoing a profound phase of differentiation and restructuring.
Let's look at some data. Over the past month, the average increase of the top 20 mainstream cryptocurrencies has reached 18%, while the median increase among coins ranked beyond 100 is only 3%. Even more striking, 40% of these smaller coins are hitting new lows. This pattern closely aligns with the "the strong get stronger" logic of traditional financial markets—funds are no longer pursuing widespread gains but are instead focusing on hunting for highly certain targets.
The actions of institutions further illustrate this point. In the past two weeks, compliance institutions have increased their investments in AI chains and Layer2 tracks by over $2 billion. The institutional holding ratio of a leading AI chain project has surged from 35% to 52%, almost a "institutional takeover." Meanwhile, projects lacking institutional backing and maintained solely by community enthusiasm have seen net capital outflows exceeding $800 million.
This is no coincidence. The market is voting in the most straightforward way: by 2026, there will be no universal bull run where everyone profits, but rather a precise differentiation between strong and weak projects. Those aligned with the right rhythm and timing are earning big, while those that miss it have no chance to participate.
To put it simply, the key now is not whether to buy, but what to buy. The main trend remains the same, but this choice is determining each participant's ultimate gains.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RegenRestorer
· 6h ago
Uh... this round of institutional accumulation really isn't playing with you. Small coin projects are bleeding too badly. Choosing the wrong track is more costly than not buying at all.
View OriginalReply0
OldLeekNewSickle
· 6h ago
Damn, 52% institutional holdings—this is not investing, it's being taken over.
---
40% at a new low, indicating retail investors are being cut again. Damn chip distribution.
---
So my current situation is: I know the direction but missed the boat.
---
Is the strong always stronger? It's just capital concentration hunting; we retail investors can only sip the soup.
---
Another "objective analysis" teaching me what to buy, for reference only haha.
---
Main trend偏线, sounds good but actually just betting right to make a lot, betting wrong to get wiped out.
---
Institutions added 2 billion in positions, sounds impressive, but we also need to think about how they are taking over.
---
Starting to choose again, so damn tiring, might as well go all in.
---
Small coin outflow of 800 million, where are all these 800 million of retail investors now?
---
This wave of divergence looks reasonable, but I always feel like I’ll be the next one to get cut.
View OriginalReply0
DancingCandles
· 6h ago
Wow, the top 20 increased by 18%, while the top 100 only by 3%. The gap is really huge.
Institutions are eating the meat, and we can only drink the soup. It's frustrating.
Choosing the wrong track is even more painful than not getting on the train. This time, there's really no chance to make easy money.
The AI chain and L2 are the two directions to hold tight to the institutions' big legs.
Small coins have dropped 40% to new lows, indicating the elimination race has begun. It's time to do some homework.
View OriginalReply0
DuskSurfer
· 6h ago
Really, small coins crashing is the norm. It's naive to still expect everyone to profit now.
Institutions are bleeding the market dry, while retail investors are still dreaming of bottom-fishing.
AI Chain has already been taken over by institutions; latecomers are just the bagholders.
The difference between main and side trends is simply making money or losing money.
Look at those coins hitting 40% new lows—why is there no more news about them?
Funds have long chosen sides; if you can't keep up, you're out.
Instead of worrying about whether to buy or not, it's better to first understand whether you're the main player or just on the sidelines.
View OriginalReply0
LightningLady
· 6h ago
Institutions are aggressively accumulating chips, while retail investors are still debating whether to buy or not. The gap is enormous.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityWitch
· 7h ago
Hi, this wave is definitely the institutions harvesting retail investors, with 40% of small coins hitting new lows. It's painful to watch.
Recently, observing the market trends has led to a clear realization: the crypto market is undergoing a profound phase of differentiation and restructuring.
Let's look at some data. Over the past month, the average increase of the top 20 mainstream cryptocurrencies has reached 18%, while the median increase among coins ranked beyond 100 is only 3%. Even more striking, 40% of these smaller coins are hitting new lows. This pattern closely aligns with the "the strong get stronger" logic of traditional financial markets—funds are no longer pursuing widespread gains but are instead focusing on hunting for highly certain targets.
The actions of institutions further illustrate this point. In the past two weeks, compliance institutions have increased their investments in AI chains and Layer2 tracks by over $2 billion. The institutional holding ratio of a leading AI chain project has surged from 35% to 52%, almost a "institutional takeover." Meanwhile, projects lacking institutional backing and maintained solely by community enthusiasm have seen net capital outflows exceeding $800 million.
This is no coincidence. The market is voting in the most straightforward way: by 2026, there will be no universal bull run where everyone profits, but rather a precise differentiation between strong and weak projects. Those aligned with the right rhythm and timing are earning big, while those that miss it have no chance to participate.
To put it simply, the key now is not whether to buy, but what to buy. The main trend remains the same, but this choice is determining each participant's ultimate gains.