The oracle track has been quite a hot topic of discussion over the past two years, but Chainlink's situation is indeed a bit awkward. As a leading project in the oracle space, it has already established strategic partnerships with top institutions including Google and JPMorgan, and its technical position is unquestionable. Strangely, these highly valuable collaborations haven't been reflected in the token price, and the market's reaction has been quite lukewarm.
There are a few points worth discussing behind this phenomenon. First, although oracles are essential infrastructure for DeFi, users' perception of their value transmission isn't very high—simply put, it's like paying water and electricity bills; people need them but don't get excited about it. Second, technical pressures are also mounting, with development progress slowing down and gas cost issues not fully resolved, all of which can impact the ecosystem's expansion speed.
Another realistic factor is that the market has favored projects with strong narratives over the past two years, and protocols like Chainlink, which are more tool-oriented, lack in "storytelling." But on the other hand, as a fundamental infrastructure of blockchain, oracles may require more time to mature before their true value is realized. For investors, the key is to understand what stage this project is in and where the risks and opportunities lie.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
Web3ExplorerLin
· 11h ago
hypothesis: chainlink's the ultimate infrastructure play that nobody gets excited about... kinda like owning the pipes instead of the water, tbh. google partnerships looking sexy on paper but the market wants moon narratives, not technical correctness 🤷
Reply0
SwapWhisperer
· 11h ago
It's quite heartfelt; the fate of infrastructure is to serve silently, and no one gets excited about paying water and electricity bills.
View OriginalReply0
ContractTester
· 11h ago
The analogy about utility bills is spot on, haha, that's exactly how it is. But I still believe Link is definitely fine in the long run. The problem is that there's really no story to tell in the short term; the crypto circle just eats this stuff up.
The oracle track has been quite a hot topic of discussion over the past two years, but Chainlink's situation is indeed a bit awkward. As a leading project in the oracle space, it has already established strategic partnerships with top institutions including Google and JPMorgan, and its technical position is unquestionable. Strangely, these highly valuable collaborations haven't been reflected in the token price, and the market's reaction has been quite lukewarm.
There are a few points worth discussing behind this phenomenon. First, although oracles are essential infrastructure for DeFi, users' perception of their value transmission isn't very high—simply put, it's like paying water and electricity bills; people need them but don't get excited about it. Second, technical pressures are also mounting, with development progress slowing down and gas cost issues not fully resolved, all of which can impact the ecosystem's expansion speed.
Another realistic factor is that the market has favored projects with strong narratives over the past two years, and protocols like Chainlink, which are more tool-oriented, lack in "storytelling." But on the other hand, as a fundamental infrastructure of blockchain, oracles may require more time to mature before their true value is realized. For investors, the key is to understand what stage this project is in and where the risks and opportunities lie.