Regarding ZEC privacy addresses (starting with zs) deposit and withdrawal issues, I recently got stuck in this trap as well. Zcash claims to have top-tier privacy features, but when it comes to actual operations, the problems arise.
The specific situation is as follows: I wanted to transfer ZEC from a major exchange to a Zcash wallet, but I found that privacy addresses are not recognized at all. After several attempts, I kept getting network recognition failure messages, and I finally realized that the platform only accepts t-addresses (transparent addresses). This is quite awkward—the privacy addresses are supposed to be ZEC's main selling point, but major platforms don't support them.
The reason behind this, I summarized later: exchanges, for compliance reasons, need to be able to trace fund flows, and privacy addresses precisely hide transaction information, which directly conflicts with the platform's risk control requirements. So they simply only provide transparent address interfaces to avoid this issue.
If you really want to use privacy addresses, the current workaround is: first transfer ZEC to your own Zcash wallet (using a transparent address), then perform an internal shielded transfer within the wallet. Only then can you enjoy privacy protection. But this is obviously less convenient than directly transferring to a privacy address from the platform.
This also reflects a real contradiction—the on-chain privacy and the compliance requirements of centralized platforms are always in conflict.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
aman1768
· 5h ago
Does privacy or lack of privacy have anything to do with retail investors? Are you trying to play dirty?
View OriginalReply0
SandwichVictim
· 10h ago
This is a typical case of "privacy dreams shattered by reality." Where is the top-tier privacy promised?
View OriginalReply0
BasementAlchemist
· 10h ago
It's really ironic about ZEC; privacy coins have been pushed to become transparent.
View OriginalReply0
TradFiRefugee
· 10h ago
That's a typical case of "idealism is grand, but reality is harsh"... Privacy coins are just a decoration on exchanges; once compliance reviews come in, they all die.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichVictim
· 10h ago
Oh no, I've also fallen into this trap, it's really outrageous.
Privacy coins are either regulated or ignored, so sad.
ZEC's recent moves are truly self-castrating, claiming privacy but relying entirely on t-addresses to survive.
Honestly, exchanges are just being cowardly, preferring to give up user experience rather than attract attention.
On-chain privacy is inherently a false proposition; as soon as you touch centralized platforms, it's game over.
Using a wallet to bypass restrictions for true privacy? Just use Monero instead.
This is the current state of Web3, where there is a gap between ideals and reality, with the word "compliance" in between.
Regarding ZEC privacy addresses (starting with zs) deposit and withdrawal issues, I recently got stuck in this trap as well. Zcash claims to have top-tier privacy features, but when it comes to actual operations, the problems arise.
The specific situation is as follows: I wanted to transfer ZEC from a major exchange to a Zcash wallet, but I found that privacy addresses are not recognized at all. After several attempts, I kept getting network recognition failure messages, and I finally realized that the platform only accepts t-addresses (transparent addresses). This is quite awkward—the privacy addresses are supposed to be ZEC's main selling point, but major platforms don't support them.
The reason behind this, I summarized later: exchanges, for compliance reasons, need to be able to trace fund flows, and privacy addresses precisely hide transaction information, which directly conflicts with the platform's risk control requirements. So they simply only provide transparent address interfaces to avoid this issue.
If you really want to use privacy addresses, the current workaround is: first transfer ZEC to your own Zcash wallet (using a transparent address), then perform an internal shielded transfer within the wallet. Only then can you enjoy privacy protection. But this is obviously less convenient than directly transferring to a privacy address from the platform.
This also reflects a real contradiction—the on-chain privacy and the compliance requirements of centralized platforms are always in conflict.