Honestly, it's very difficult for the Web3 community to break out on its own these days. Especially for foundational infrastructure projects like oracles, whether you can form collaborations with other projects essentially determines how far the entire project can go. Today, starting from real-world cases, let's talk about how fierce the ecosystem layout of a certain oracle project is, and what kind of value these collaborations have created for assets within its ecosystem.
I first paid attention to this project because of its partnership with a leading DeFi lending platform. The core pain point of DeFi lending is straightforward—accurate real-time pricing of collateral assets. If the price data is flawed, the consequences are extreme: either borrowers suffer huge losses and get liquidated, or the platform bears bad debt. Many small lending platforms have failed because of this; an attack on the oracle data can cause a collapse. But after this project got involved, it used multi-source data aggregation combined with multi-layer node verification, effectively improving the accuracy of price data and risk control levels.
What was the result? The bad debt rate of that lending platform significantly decreased, and user growth started to soar. But even more interesting is that, for the oracle project itself, this was not just about gaining a new partner. Think about it—massive amounts of real transaction data generated daily by the lending platform directly became golden datasets for optimizing algorithm models. As a result, the accuracy of the oracle was further enhanced. This is true win-win—each side benefits and helps each other succeed.
Another collaboration case that left a deep impression is its linkage with a cross-chain bridge project. What's the biggest risk of cross-chain bridges? Information asymmetry. Asset prices and transaction statuses on different blockchains are prone to mismatch, which can easily turn into security vulnerabilities. This oracle project directly built a unified price information hub for the cross-chain bridge, providing a recognized pricing system for assets across multiple chains. Suddenly, the security level of the cross-chain bridge increased significantly, and user risk concerns were greatly alleviated.
From an ecosystem perspective, this kind of collaboration logic is very clear: oracles provide the foundational data infrastructure, and various applications like DeFi, cross-chain, derivatives, etc., depend on the accuracy of this data. A project that fully understands this positioning and offers stable, reliable services naturally gains trust, attracting more and more ecosystem participants. The more participants there are, the richer the data generated, which in turn improves the data quality of the oracle—forming a positive feedback loop.
Therefore, in the Web3 ecosystem, going it alone is often a dead end. But if you can, like this project, find your position within the ecosystem chain, continuously build ecosystem collaborations, and enable all participants to benefit, the foundation becomes stable, and the space for imagination naturally opens up.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CryptoWageSlave
· 6h ago
Now I understand, the ecosystem is the moat.
---
The premise of a win-win situation is finding the right position. The oracle's positioning is just perfect.
---
Multi-source data aggregation really maximizes the potential, unlike some projects that just boast.
---
That's right, going solo in Web3 is a dead end, but so many projects are still stubbornly holding on.
---
The decline in bad debt rates on lending platforms is quite impressive; I don't know if it's true or not.
---
The pain point of cross-chain bridges is indeed here. The idea of a unified pricing system is spot on.
---
Positive feedback loops sound perfect, but the question is how many projects can truly form one.
---
It still seems to come down to who can secure their position first. Latecomers will find it hard to turn the tide.
---
The data set perspective is good; the more partners, the stronger the ecosystem. This logic makes sense.
View OriginalReply0
SadMoneyMeow
· 9h ago
That’s right, oracles really need to band together; going solo definitely can't hold up.
Data accuracy is the lifeline, I have deep experience with this.
The analysis of cross-chain bridges is quite good; information asymmetry is indeed a major issue.
I love the concept of positive feedback in the ecosystem; no wonder leading projects are getting stronger.
Going solo in Web3 really doesn’t last long; these days, it’s all about banding together for mutual support.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerGas
· 9h ago
Ecological collaboration is indeed the way to go, but the problem is that most projects simply can't reach this level.
I agree with the part about data goldification; this is the kind of gameplay a decentralized oracle should have.
The security risks of cross-chain bridges have never been fully resolved, and this entry point is indeed very sharp.
That's right, going solo in Web3 basically has no future, but very few can truly integrate resources.
Once this positive feedback loop gets running, it becomes a Matthew effect, and latecomers find it very hard to catch up.
View OriginalReply0
ImpermanentPhobia
· 9h ago
Damn, this is the way Web3 should be played. Ecosystem collaboration is a hundred times stronger than working alone.
Oracles may seem obscure, but they are truly the emperor of infrastructure. Whoever controls data accuracy controls the lifeline.
That cross-chain bridge case blew my mind. Information asymmetry is indeed the biggest cancer. No wonder a unified pricing system is needed.
Basically, it's about finding the right position for yourself, then rolling the snowball. The more projects that connect to the data, the more accurate it becomes. This positive feedback loop is no joke.
I've seen too many projects that go solo and end up as worthless tokens. Collaborative ecosystems are the way to survive.
But to be honest, the key is still to have real value output. Just banding together is pointless.
View OriginalReply0
PancakeFlippa
· 9h ago
That's right, now it's really about relying on the ecosystem to survive; going solo is truly not feasible.
The accuracy of oracle data is indeed the core; otherwise, the entire DeFi is just a castle in the air.
This positive feedback loop is really intense— the more it's used, the more accurate it becomes, and the more accurate it is, the more people will use it.
I also paid attention to the cross-chain bridge case before; it indeed solved a major problem.
The gameplay of underlying infrastructure is like this: you need the entire ecosystem to depend on you.
Going solo truly has no way out; it seems we need to band together for mutual support.
Honestly, it's very difficult for the Web3 community to break out on its own these days. Especially for foundational infrastructure projects like oracles, whether you can form collaborations with other projects essentially determines how far the entire project can go. Today, starting from real-world cases, let's talk about how fierce the ecosystem layout of a certain oracle project is, and what kind of value these collaborations have created for assets within its ecosystem.
I first paid attention to this project because of its partnership with a leading DeFi lending platform. The core pain point of DeFi lending is straightforward—accurate real-time pricing of collateral assets. If the price data is flawed, the consequences are extreme: either borrowers suffer huge losses and get liquidated, or the platform bears bad debt. Many small lending platforms have failed because of this; an attack on the oracle data can cause a collapse. But after this project got involved, it used multi-source data aggregation combined with multi-layer node verification, effectively improving the accuracy of price data and risk control levels.
What was the result? The bad debt rate of that lending platform significantly decreased, and user growth started to soar. But even more interesting is that, for the oracle project itself, this was not just about gaining a new partner. Think about it—massive amounts of real transaction data generated daily by the lending platform directly became golden datasets for optimizing algorithm models. As a result, the accuracy of the oracle was further enhanced. This is true win-win—each side benefits and helps each other succeed.
Another collaboration case that left a deep impression is its linkage with a cross-chain bridge project. What's the biggest risk of cross-chain bridges? Information asymmetry. Asset prices and transaction statuses on different blockchains are prone to mismatch, which can easily turn into security vulnerabilities. This oracle project directly built a unified price information hub for the cross-chain bridge, providing a recognized pricing system for assets across multiple chains. Suddenly, the security level of the cross-chain bridge increased significantly, and user risk concerns were greatly alleviated.
From an ecosystem perspective, this kind of collaboration logic is very clear: oracles provide the foundational data infrastructure, and various applications like DeFi, cross-chain, derivatives, etc., depend on the accuracy of this data. A project that fully understands this positioning and offers stable, reliable services naturally gains trust, attracting more and more ecosystem participants. The more participants there are, the richer the data generated, which in turn improves the data quality of the oracle—forming a positive feedback loop.
Therefore, in the Web3 ecosystem, going it alone is often a dead end. But if you can, like this project, find your position within the ecosystem chain, continuously build ecosystem collaborations, and enable all participants to benefit, the foundation becomes stable, and the space for imagination naturally opens up.