Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
A certain wallet service platform recently announced a serious security incident. According to official statements, the root cause of this incident was a operational vulnerability during the data center expansion and migration process, which led to the leakage of some users' wallet information. After the incident occurred, the platform quickly isolated the affected users' assets in an emergency attempt to prevent further losses.
Unfortunately, hackers have successfully cracked the leaked data and have begun large-scale transfers of user assets. Since some users continue to use their previous wallet addresses for transactions, this has given hackers an opportunity. Currently, the total direct economic loss from the incident is approximately $250,000.
The platform has initiated a user compensation plan, and related compensation applications have been mostly distributed. This incident serves as a reminder to all users: during sensitive periods such as data migration and system upgrades, it is important to strengthen account security, promptly update wallet passwords, enable two-factor authentication, and adopt other protective measures.
---
Losing $250,000 is one thing, but having to change your password yourself is not worth it
---
Leaks and hackers, it's really , I'm still using this platform
---
So, self-hosting is more reliable, don't bother with these centralized flashy things
---
Compensation plan? Who knows when something will go wrong again, it doesn't feel very safe
---
Expanding the data center can cause these kinds of issues, the operations team is really capable
---
I've heard about problems with this platform before, and this time it finally got exposed
---
What’s the use of two-factor authentication? They can just access your data directly from the backend, lol
---
Is it only $250,000? I think the actual loss is even bigger, just not all exposed
---
The compensation has been issued, right? Then it's fine, just keep using it
Hackers directly transferred people's funds, and $250,000 is gone just like that.
Still using old addresses for transactions—really unbelievable. This money was given away for free.
The compensation plan sounds promising, but I'm just worried there might be more trouble down the line.
Daring to operate wallets like this, I'm convinced.
Losing $250,000 is the end of the story? The platform's move here is a bit outrageous.
I told you early on to enable two-factor authentication, but some people just wouldn't listen.
These hackers are really efficient; as soon as data leaks, they immediately transfer funds, making it hard to defend against.
The compensation plan sounds good, but it all depends on whether it can be truly implemented.
In the future, I need to be more cautious during wallet migrations.
Brothers, have the compensations been fully provided? Feels like this operation was a bit careless.
Still the same advice, managing your own wallet is the way to go, don’t put all your eggs in one basket.
I enabled two-factor authentication a long time ago, just worried there might be other vulnerabilities that haven't been exposed yet.
How long has this been exposed? Are there still many people using this platform now?
Honestly, the hacker’s move was brilliant, directly targeting those still using the old address, pretty ruthless.
During migration, withdrawals shouldn’t have been disabled; why allow continued trading? That logic doesn’t add up.
It's really $250,000 gone, and users still have to shoulder the blame and update passwords themselves. Interesting.
Hackers are so rampant, the platform's emergency response really can't keep up.
The compensation plan sounds good, but trust has already hit zero.
Once again, operational vulnerabilities—call it human error at best. Such incidents should be fined.
It's not clear how the $250,000 was compensated; it feels like they're shifting the blame back to the users.
Why is it always a problem during the migration process? Couldn't such risks have been anticipated in advance?
So I have to wait passively for the official response; might as well switch wallets myself.
This is why people always say that self-custody wallets are the safest—giving your assets to the platform is just a gamble on their integrity.
As soon as the compensation plan is issued, it's over? $250,000 is gone just like that?
Truly the internet generation, users who don't even change their passwords really dare to play
Didn't this platform have issues a couple of years ago? Why are people still using it?
Can't even afford to lose 250,000. When will the platform learn to do things properly?
What’s the use of two-factor authentication? The key issue is that I still can't trust these platforms.
Compensation plan, just say it and it will be issued. I don’t believe you.
I've always said that centralized wallets are not worth it; self-protection is more reliable.
This time, a bunch of people will probably change their passwords and fuss around for a long time.
Hackers have already started, and you're only isolating now. It's a bit late, brother.