2025-12-30 07:20:31

The blockchain ecosystem is constantly evolving, and the capacity and functionality of a single public chain have become bottlenecks. The current situation is somewhat like the early days of the internet with isolated networks, where each system operated independently. The current direction of the crypto ecosystem is to break this fragmentation—enabling seamless transfer of value and state information between different blockchains and execution environments to achieve true interoperability.

This is the core value of cross-chain bridges. According to data from DeFiLlama, the growth trend of the total locked value(Bridged TVL) in cross-chain bridges indicates the genuine market demand—more and more assets need to flow between different chains. This reflects the broader industry trend of upgrading from isolated islands to a value internet. Only when true interoperability is achieved can DeFi, NFTs, and Web3 applications have greater potential.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

InscriptionGriller

· 11h ago

Cross-chain bridges sound good, but the reality is just a new trick to scam retail investors. TVL skyrocketing? That's just funds moving around between chains; it's a game of hot potato played by crypto enthusiasts. When smart contract vulnerabilities are exposed, those locked assets will turn to ashes in seconds. Don't cry then.

View OriginalReply0

NewPumpamentals

· 18h ago

I've seen it for a long time, the era of single chains is really over. Now it's just a matter of whose bridge solution is more stable. Bridge security risks are still quite significant. Even though TVL is increasing, I still feel a bit worried. Interconnectivity is easy to talk about, but technically it still feels early to fully implement. DeFiLlama's data is growing rapidly, but it still depends on whether the assets crossing the bridge can truly become liquid. While there are fragmentation issues, we can't ignore the risks inherent in bridges themselves. No one wants to go through the Ronin incident again. Ultimately, the key is who can develop the most elegant cross-chain solution—that will be the real dividing line.

View OriginalReply0

blockBoy

· 20h ago

Cross-chain is indeed a valid point, but with so many bridge solutions available now, who truly dares to guarantee their security?

View OriginalReply0

CantAffordPancake

· 12-30 07:49

Cross-chain sounds nice in theory, but the security issues with bridges are still a big pitfall, and they get hacked all the time... Interoperability is a good concept, but the premise is to avoid introducing so many vulnerabilities. Simply looking at TVL growth doesn't tell the whole story; what's crucial is whether there are real application needs. Islands definitely need to be connected, but right now it feels more like we've built a "dangerous bridge" between various islands. Instead of just hyping up interoperability, wouldn't it be better to thoroughly audit the existing bridges first?

View OriginalReply0

TokenomicsPolice

· 12-30 07:44

Cross-chain has been talked about for so long, but how many truly useful bridges are there? Most of them are just cutting the leeks.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeWhisperer

· 12-30 07:44

Cross-chain bridges, to put it simply, are still burning money in exploration. The real interoperability that doesn't lag or cost too much is the true way forward.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainWorker

· 12-30 07:32

Cross-chain sounds nice, but right now it's still a bunch of shitcoins running around on various chains... When will true interoperability actually be realized?

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerWallet