Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
More
Interestingly, Manus founder Xiao Hong's choices can be considered textbook-level—he has ridden the wave of AI innovation while not missing out on the current cryptocurrency cycle. According to social media disclosures, he is even a BTC holder.
This "dual-engine" holding strategy is becoming increasingly common in the startup world. On one hand, there is the urgency of AI application implementation; on the other hand, there is recognition of the long-term value of crypto assets. Some say it's luck, but more accurately, it's an insight into technological trends—both tracks represent major future growth directions.
Whether driven by faith or strategy, entrepreneurs like Xiao Hong answer a question with their actions: why do top builders often have a positive outlook on both AI and Crypto?
The real inside story should be like this: on one side, it's easy to tell stories about AI financing, while on the other side, hoarding BTC as a backup, so you can't really lose.
I remember a friend did the same before; the AI project failed, and the coin didn't rise. Now he's still there sighing.
Top builders simultaneously optimistic about two tracks? I think it's mostly a strong sense of security, haha.
These days, who only bets on one? Diversifying risk is the real smart move.
The combination of BTC holders and AI entrepreneurs seems to have diversified risk control, but in reality, their lending positions are probably maxed out.
To put it simply, the bets are still concentrated on high growth expectations, and even market fluctuations of 0.37% can cause tension.
Are top builders optimistic about the dual-track approach? I think it's more about leverage planning... Who will bear the risk premium?
This kind of holding logic is a bit dangerous; once the liquidation threshold is triggered, both sides will have to run.
However, it must be acknowledged that with proper insight, the dual engines can achieve exponential growth... The key is still designing a good risk control mechanism.
---
Xiao Hong's skills are incredibly steady, AI+BTC, one by one, there's no need to all in on one side
---
Basically, those who understand the cycle won't just chew on the bones when it's time to eat meat
---
What does textbook-level mean... this is the standard for realists
---
The choices of top builders boil down to two words: not stupid
---
So the question is, what are those entrepreneurs who only all in on one track thinking?
---
With a deeper understanding, others are playing chess, some are still looking at one move
---
This strategy three years ago was called luck; now it's just basic operation