2025-12-25 20:21:36

Many projects are struggling with community daily active users and posting frequency, but this KPI logic is really outdated.

Our approach is different. The key is not how many people are talking, but how many conversations are driving the project forward. Those well-thought-out suggestions, genuine collaborations, and verifiable results are the true reflection of community value.

Honestly, quality silence is far better than low-quality spamming. A focused and tight core execution team, paired with a group of supporters who truly understand and share the mission, often has a power that is seriously underestimated. In contrast, those seemingly lively but fragmented groups tend to drain energy and create noise.

In ecosystem development, our principle is simple: quality always comes first.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

23 Likes

Reward
23
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

FreeRider

· 12-28 15:45

Exactly right, having a bunch of zombie accounts with high daily active users is useless The core is so simple: prefer ten genuine believers over a thousand who just jump on the bandwagon Really, those communities that flood the screens every day are often the first to collapse Quality over quantity, this is not a new concept, but no one wants to listen Already tired of some projects using daily active users as a cover-up

View OriginalReply0

YieldWhisperer

· 12-27 08:44

nah tbh the math on "quality over noise" only works if you actually *have* verifiable outcomes to show for it. seen too many projects use this exact pitch while their contracts are basically empty shells. let's examine the actual on-chain activity before we declare dau metrics dead, fr

Reply0

BlockchainArchaeologist

· 12-25 20:47

You're so right. I've really had enough of project teams that only focus on daily active users. Why is it so hard to understand that quality > quantity?

View OriginalReply0

gas_guzzler

· 12-25 20:39

Exactly right. Project managers who constantly monitor daily active user data should wake up already. A bunch of mindless spam accounts are useless; they'd be better off with a developer who truly understands coding. Quality > Quantity, there's nothing wrong with that statement.

View OriginalReply0

LuckyBearDrawer

· 12-25 20:36

I deeply agree; I've seen too many projects constantly boast about daily active users, but it turns out to be all zombie fans and bots spamming the screens. A truly valuable community should have already cut off those inefficient communications. I'd rather have a hundred people deeply engaged than ten thousand people each saying their own thing. This is the core indicator I look for in a project.

View OriginalReply0

CoconutWaterBoy

· 12-25 20:24

That's right, many projects are fooled by this false prosperity KPI. A truly capable community doesn't need to flood the screens daily to create hype. It's better to have ten core contributors with ideas than a thousand trolls who only repeat. The principle of quality first is timeless in Web3.

View OriginalReply0