2025-12-25 20:20:50

There is a project doing something quite interesting — using Layer-1 blockchain to tailor payment infrastructure for AI agents. The core idea is to enable these autonomous AI agents to have verifiable identities, programmable governance, and the ability to transact directly, essentially building an "internet of agents."

The platform itself is compatible with EVM, integrating native identity verification, encrypted wallets, and real-time payment settlement. This significantly enhances the security and efficiency of machine-to-machine interactions, while also filling the gap in AI infrastructure on-chain. It sounds like preparing for the decentralization of the AI economy — reducing reliance on centralized intermediaries and building a scalable, trustless ecosystem.

Of course, this approach also faces practical challenges. On one hand, user adoption has a barrier; on the other hand, the collision of blockchain and AI still involves many regulatory uncertainties. But if this system can be successfully implemented, it could accelerate the deployment of AI-driven business and governance applications in a decentralized environment.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

19 Likes

Reward
19
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

gas_fee_therapist

· 12-28 18:51

Another AI + blockchain combination? Honestly, just hearing these two words gives me a headache. Let’s wait and see if it really gets implemented before making any judgments. --- AI agents paying each other... Can this really be realized? It still feels too idealistic. --- Regulation is the real killer here. Don’t let the project get started only to be shut down by a single official document. --- EVM compatibility is pretty good; at least it doesn’t reinvent the wheel, so it’s hassle-free. --- Decentralized AI economy sounds awesome, but in reality, who will foot the bill? It still depends on venture capital funding. --- Wait, direct transactions between machines... Does that mean AI will be on-chain stealing my tokens in the future? --- If this thing really works, it will outperform most current L1s. --- Identity verification + payment settlement in one package, the idea is decent, but I’m worried it’s just vaporware. --- Isn’t it obvious that the user threshold is high? Web3 itself is already complicated enough, and now with AI agents?

View OriginalReply0

WenAirdrop

· 12-28 00:14

Hmm… AI agents transferring funds themselves? It sounds a bit sci-fi, but it definitely fills a gap. --- Machine-to-machine payments… thinking about it, it’s quite scary, but this direction is indeed worth paying attention to. --- Another Layer-1 and EVM, it still feels a bit early for this set of technologies. Regulation is really a big pit. --- So in the end, it still depends on user adoption… that’s probably the hardest part. --- Agent economy sounds great, but can it really break away from centralized intermediaries… big question mark. --- Verifiable identity plus real-time settlement, if it can really be implemented, should be revolutionary. --- Isn’t this just an AI version of DeFi? It seems like the right direction, but the timing might not be right yet. --- Believe it or not, I think this thing might not even work in five years haha. --- Bridging the gap in on-chain AI infrastructure, this rhetoric sounds a bit over the top… but the idea itself is fine. --- Interesting as it is, the question is: who really needs this?

View OriginalReply0

BasementAlchemist

· 12-25 20:49

Machines transferring to each other, this idea is really awesome. However, it seems like it will take a few years to get through the regulatory hurdles. --- AI managing wallets and trading on its own? If this really works out, we workers might truly be eliminated. --- EVM compatibility + native wallets, the tech stack looks pretty good, but I wonder if it can survive the first bear market. --- The internet among agents sounds very Web3, but user adoption is really a hurdle that can't be bypassed. --- Regulatory issues are indeed a hidden danger. The combination of blockchain and AI is too sensitive; if it gets targeted, it’s game over. --- If regulatory issues can be solved, this could indeed fill a gap. But it feels a bit too idealistic. --- Decentralized AI economy, sounds good, but can cost control and security audits keep up? I always feel like something might go wrong.

View OriginalReply0

ImpermanentPhobia

· 12-25 20:48

AI agents manage their own wallets? That logic is a bit extreme. --- Sounds nice, but isn't it just another story of VC cutting the leeks again? --- Machine-to-machine trading... sounds like laying the infrastructure for Skynet haha. --- Can this really pass regulation? It feels like this thing was born with shackles. --- Can the EVM compatibility solve real AI governance issues? It always feels like just talk on paper. --- Decentralization sounds great, but the high entry barrier means users might still fall behind. --- Isn't this just a different skin for the automated market maker system? --- If it really works, that would be shocking, but it's too early to hype it now.

View OriginalReply0

All-InQueen

· 12-25 20:38

Machine-to-machine payments? Sounds pretty sci-fi, but how will the regulations handle this? --- Another AI and blockchain project—can it really be implemented or is it just another PPT presentation? Let's wait and see. --- Damn, this idea is pretty bold—skipping human middlemen and having agents handle the money themselves. --- EVM compatibility sounds good, but how to break down the user barrier? Ordinary people just can't get it. --- Rather than calling it infrastructure, it's more like gambling that regulators are asleep at the wheel. --- Decentralized AI economy—listening ten times and still not convinced. Still, big companies are the key. --- If this really works out, traditional finance will be crying. But the chances are pretty slim. --- Layer-1 doing this might be a bit redundant, isn't it always about building payment infrastructure? --- Robot paying another robot—what if the next step is robots going on strike and refusing to pay? --- Identity verification is a bright spot, but will the costs be prohibitively high?

View OriginalReply0