2025-12-25 13:24:34

Currently in the performance sprint period, I noticed an adjustment when logging into the daily check-in feature of a certain Web3 application. Now, it requires activation within the relevant account system to continue participating, and the check-in rewards have also been modified—from original points to 10 $BILL tokens.

Interestingly, the platform's membership card scheme reveals the market pricing logic of the token. Spending 20U to obtain membership benefits, with a bonus of 1000 $BILL and $10 cash, in other words, the value of 1000 $BILL is set at $10, making each $BILL approximately equal to 0.01U. This pricing aligns with the project's previous ICO valuation on a certain crypto financing platform, indicating that the platform maintains consistency in its pricing system. This data consistency itself is noteworthy, reflecting the project's serious attitude towards its token economic model.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

UncommonNPC

· 12-28 11:07

They're starting to do the activation thing again, so annoying --- 0.01U per coin? Can this pricing hold up... --- Wait, you can only sign in after account activation? More money-grabbing --- Data consistency says so, but I feel like it's just legitimizing the money-grabbing --- 20U for 1000 coins plus $10 cash, the platform is really solid --- Points to coin exchange? Trying to make us accept price fluctuations --- This logical closed loop is so perfect that it makes me a bit suspicious --- Now you need to activate your account to sign in, truly impressive --- What was $BILL's price at ICO? This info is crucial --- Changing rules during the sprint period, you really dare to do that

View OriginalReply0

DeFiVeteran

· 12-28 08:39

Tsk tsk, changing the rules again. This time you can only check in by activating on-chain? Feels like a scam. Really making fun of me, converting one BILL to just 0.01U. If I check in 10 each day, that's only about 0.1U. Workers' hearts are broken. By the way, their pricing dimension is actually the same as ICO, isn't it usually supposed to be broken through... It has that familiar feel. Once the activation requirement is announced, I guess many free riders will be discouraged again. Maybe that's the result they want.

View OriginalReply0

ChainComedian

· 12-28 04:44

Changing the rules again? You still need to activate for check-in? This is troublesome. --- $BILL changing from points to tokens, a $0.01 USD pricing is quite honest. --- Adjusting the mechanism right at the performance sprint period, I’m familiar with this trick. --- The pricing logic of the membership card is actually testing the bottom line. --- This move of changing points to tokens, do you think it can boost the market? --- The $0.01 USD pricing matches the ICO, at least don’t fool us. --- Activating every day, are we opening a bank here?

View OriginalReply0

WalletInspector

· 12-25 13:46

Changed the rules again, now even signing in requires account activation? This trick is getting more and more complicated.

View OriginalReply0

GamefiHarvester

· 12-25 13:41

Another check-in threshold? That's really impressive, but the $BILL pricing logic is quite transparent, no random price shouting. --- 20U for 1000 coins plus 10 dollars, which is about 0.01U per coin, same as the ICO price... at least the project team isn't scamming, which is quite rare. --- You need to activate to check in, feels like another wave of cutting leeks, but with such a rigorous pricing system, maybe there's still hope? --- Wait, reverse-engineering the price with a membership card... this move is indeed clever, indicating that the token economy isn't just casually thrown together. --- Changing from points to $BILL, during the sprint phase, it still relies on issuing tokens to suck blood, same old trick. --- 0.01U isn't cheap, only 1 cent for ten check-ins, you need to accumulate a lot to make it worthwhile. --- Wow, the pricing system aligns with the ICO valuation, at least it's not a piece of trash project that crashes immediately after launch. --- Activation + token rewards, a standard user-pulling tactic, just see if there's liquidity support later on.

View OriginalReply0

WalletDetective

· 12-25 13:41

The sign-in rules have been changed again, this time directly switching to tokens. --- Pricing at 0.01U, quite interesting... Is this the price during the ICO? --- You need to activate your account to sign in? The threshold is higher again. --- That membership card pricing logic feels like they've just fixed the coin price. --- Is BILL's recent operation aiming to stabilize the price or to cut the leeks? It's hard to see through. --- Changing from points to tokens, is it really fewer rewards or just a name change? --- Data consistency... sounds good, but I'm worried there might be a twist later. --- A $20 membership card for 1000 coins, is this economic model serious? --- Sign-in activation system, with new operations during the sprint period, user experience drops sharply. --- The issue of a unit price of 0.01, we'll see if it can hold up later.

View OriginalReply0

LiquidityWhisperer