2025-12-25 13:24:03

Here's an interesting wrinkle: Sonar sale participants got the option to unlock their tokens early—but at a cost. Community response? Some felt it was basically dumping liquid tokens for a markup. Reality check: that wasn't the play at all. The mechanism's actually designed differently, but clearly the messaging missed the mark. Worth revisiting how to communicate these nuances better.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MissingSats

· 6h ago

Messaging definitely underperforms, but the early unlock mechanism... well, how should I put it, it really depends on the actual data to determine whether it's truly "different."

View OriginalReply0

ProxyCollector

· 12-25 13:50

Early unlocks require a fee? Isn't this just the project team indirectly harvesting profits? It's just a different way of saying it that sounds less harsh.

View OriginalReply0

TokenEconomist

· 12-25 13:38

actually, let me break this down—the pricing mechanism here is essentially a liquidity premium, not a dump. think of it like traditional finance: early withdrawal always costs, ceteris paribus. community just misread the incentive structure

Reply0

GasFeeCrybaby

· 12-25 13:37

Early unlocks require additional payment. This time, the communication indeed wasn't effective, but those who are just accompanying should have understood that this is the game rule.

View OriginalReply0

PoetryOnChain

· 12-25 13:31

I've always felt that this type of early unlock mechanism has the worst communication. Why can't anyone explain the logic clearly?

View OriginalReply0