2025-12-25 12:50:10

#比特币与黄金战争 Recently, the upgrade trends of Ethereum privacy protocols have attracted a lot of attention. Can $ETH 's privacy enhancement solutions become the next technological breakthrough? This is a question worth deep consideration.

From a broader perspective, we can also think about the competitive relationship between Bitcoin and traditional financial assets (such as gold). Both serve as stores of value, each with its own characteristics—one is a product of the digital age, and the other is an asset validated over thousands of years. How will the market weigh the status of these two assets? This reflects a consideration of the evolution of the financial system.

As the demand for privacy protection increases and blockchain infrastructure improves, platforms like Ethereum are exploring how to find a balance between transparency and privacy. This process is full of challenges as well as opportunities. If you're interested in discussing, we can chat about it together.

BTC0.18%

ETH0.08%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

failed_dev_successful_ape

· 7h ago

Privacy is really a weakness of Ethereum, but it feels a bit late to start pushing now... But on the other hand, can Bitcoin's old-fashioned stuff really compare to gold? I'm skeptical.

View OriginalReply0

WhaleWatcher

· 7h ago

No matter how fancy the privacy solution is, it cannot change Ethereum's destiny; it still depends on whether the ecosystem can truly implement it. Bitcoin is king; gold? That's just an old-fashioned choice. ETH privacy upgrade? Feels like just hype, with limited practical use. There’s no real balance between transparency and privacy—choose one, or get nothing. Gold hasn't changed in thousands of years; Bitcoin has proven itself in fifteen years, no need to compare. Another "full of opportunities" narrative—hearing it too much is starting to get tiresome.

View OriginalReply0

StakeOrRegret

· 7h ago

Privacy is one of those things that's easy to talk about but hard to do. If ETH can truly balance transparency and privacy, that would be a real skill. Gold has been lying in wait for thousands of years; if BTC wants to turn things around, it needs to put in more effort. If ETH's privacy upgrade really gets implemented, will it instead attract more gray areas? No one dares to discuss this in detail. Bitcoin and gold are like two competing favorites, but frankly, those who are optimistic are truly optimistic, and those who are not can't be persuaded. As the privacy protection trend becomes more intense, it's really hard to choose which chain to focus on.

View OriginalReply0

gas_fee_therapist

· 7h ago

Privacy... to put it simply, it's the eternal battle between regulation and freedom. ETH trying to have it both ways might end up getting criticized from both sides. Gold has been around for thousands of years and is still alive. BTC has only been around for a little over a decade, and it wants to turn the world upside down? Overthinking it, haha. Transparency and privacy are fundamentally false propositions. If privacy were truly a priority, Monero would have already taken the lead. ETH's recent moves are just marketing.

View OriginalReply0

SatoshiChallenger

· 7h ago

Ironically, every privacy upgrade is hyped as "the next breakthrough," but how many have actually been implemented? Data shows that those privacy-focused cryptocurrencies have adoption rates far below expectations. Do they still have the audacity to compare themselves to gold [cold laugh]. Another story of "finding a balance between transparency and privacy," last year Monero said the same thing. And now? It’s been delisted from exchanges and forgotten. I've heard this narrative too many times. I'm not criticizing; Bitcoin has been validated over 15 years, and gold has thousands of years of history, but ETH's privacy solutions haven't even withstood a year's market test. Why should we think this time will be different? Just listen and don't take it seriously. Every major upgrade is hyped like this, but after the upgrade? The coin price still drops. Ask yourself if you've ever made money.

View OriginalReply0

GhostInTheChain

· 7h ago

Honestly, privacy is a bit awkward right now. How to achieve both transparency and privacy... it's tough. BTC compared to gold? Ha, still too young. Need to settle for another few decades. ETH's privacy solutions feel a bit theoretical; let's see when they go live. Gold has been stable for thousands of years; that's the true essence of value storage. Don't always think about overtaking through shortcuts. Privacy needs are real, but exchanges still require KYC—ironic, isn't it? Computing power versus metals, the ultimate showdown... interesting. It's just a matter of old versus new, choosing sides. Upgrading privacy protocols... another concept hype? Let's wait and see. BTC isn't that magical, and gold isn't that outdated—both are just hedging tools. This question has been asked for years, and there's still no answer. Having good infrastructure doesn't mean privacy issues are solved—don't confuse the two. Transparency and privacy are inherently contradictory; blockchain is forcing a compromise. I'm tired of hearing the "Bitcoin as digital gold" narrative; there's a big difference. In terms of privacy tech, Ethereum doesn't have any particular advantage either.

View OriginalReply0

RunWithRugs

· 7h ago

Privacy upgrades sound good, but honestly, with ETH being so competitive, it's more likely to attract regulatory attention, right? Bitcoin is much more straightforward.

View OriginalReply0