#合约诈骗与虚假网站 The warning from the Hong Kong Monetary Authority is worth noting. The methods of impersonating official websites for scams are becoming increasingly sophisticated—cloning domain names, copying visual elements, fabricating tax fee reasons, and almost completely replicating official procedures to lower victims' guard. These cases reflect the scammers' profit models within the on-chain ecosystem: inducing users to transfer funds or authorize contracts via fake websites, with funds flowing directly into the scammers' wallets, then quickly cross-chain transferred or mixed.

From an on-chain tracking perspective, these scams have clear characteristics—after funds enter, there are usually abnormal large-scale transfers or cross-chain bridging within a short period. However, prevention mainly starts at the source: no official organization will proactively ask you to transfer funds or pay taxes; this is a strict rule. When receiving unfamiliar links, verify directly through official channels and avoid clicking on unknown URLs out of convenience.

For investment research, this also provides a reference dimension for identifying risky projects—whether the team has a history of similar deception, whether contract permissions are abnormal, and whether fund flows are transparent. In the crypto market, due diligence is always cheaper than regret.