Recently reflected on a profound lesson — in the crypto market, staying away from assets with unclear industry logic and questionable fundamentals is really crucial, including attitude issues from some founding teams.
I've seen many projects with technical fraud and fake trading on K-line charts. These "cover-your-mouth" assets, no matter how much they are promoted, cannot change their essence. Relying on them to turn things around? That’s just too naive. No one can say for sure what kind of pressure is building behind these projects.
In comparison, within similar price ranges, other assets have much clearer investment return logic. For example, some mature DEX tokens bought between $0.5 and $1.5, both in terms of fundamentals and liquidity, offer much better value. Ultimately, choosing the right track and project is more reliable than gambling on a market surge.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidatedAgain
· 8h ago
Being liquidated again, reading this kind of article really hits me hard now... There's nothing wrong with what you said, but why wasn't I so clear-headed back then? I went all in on a technical fraud scam, the K-line looked suspicious right away, and I stubbornly deceived myself into buying for two years.
View OriginalReply0
DefiOldTrickster
· 8h ago
Oh, there's nothing wrong with what you said. Over the years, I've been scared off by those "technological innovations." When the K-line is manipulated, my whole mindset collapses.
The 0.5 to 1.5 range is indeed a blessed zone, with deep liquidity and clear fundamentals, ten thousand times more reliable than those trash coins that tell stories every day.
It's really about choosing the right projects. I now prefer lower annualized returns rather than touching projects with weird founder attitudes. It's just too risky.
View OriginalReply0
Blockblind
· 8h ago
Honestly, the crypto world is like this; rebranding bad projects is pointless.
I almost got scammed by a clone project before, now I stay far away from anything suspicious.
The DEX side is indeed more solid and reliable than blindly investing in everything.
View OriginalReply0
WinterWarmthCat
· 8h ago
A bloody lesson indeed, only after stepping on many pits did I understand this truth.
That's right, those technical frauds and manipulative K-line tricks should really be avoided. I've seen a few that ended up going to zero.
DEX tokens in the 0.5-1.5 price range are indeed attractive, with much clearer fundamentals.
Damn, I wish I hadn't gambled on those crappy projects.
Honestly, instead of dreaming of getting rich overnight, it's safer to choose a stable track and stick to it.
I really don't touch projects with poor team attitudes; that's a red line.
Recently reflected on a profound lesson — in the crypto market, staying away from assets with unclear industry logic and questionable fundamentals is really crucial, including attitude issues from some founding teams.
I've seen many projects with technical fraud and fake trading on K-line charts. These "cover-your-mouth" assets, no matter how much they are promoted, cannot change their essence. Relying on them to turn things around? That’s just too naive. No one can say for sure what kind of pressure is building behind these projects.
In comparison, within similar price ranges, other assets have much clearer investment return logic. For example, some mature DEX tokens bought between $0.5 and $1.5, both in terms of fundamentals and liquidity, offer much better value. Ultimately, choosing the right track and project is more reliable than gambling on a market surge.