My friend recently asked me: You’re so optimistic about ASTER, do you really believe it could become the next BNB? If you’re so confident, why keep adding to your position?
My answer is: I have no certainty at all. Honestly, ASTER could completely go to zero.
His expression at the time was a bit hard to hide—since it could go to zero, why bother buying more?
At first glance, this question seems reasonable; upon reflection, it’s clear that the person asking has somewhat mythologized investing.
Whether trading cryptocurrencies or stocks, no one can achieve a 100% success rate. Even Warren Buffett can’t. Plus, the risks in crypto are obviously greater than in stocks. In the stock market, there are safe-haven options like blue-chip stocks; in the crypto world? BTC itself carries a theoretical risk of going to zero, let alone latecomers like ASTER.
But that’s exactly the charm of crypto assets—their potential returns can far surpass traditional stock markets.
The key question is this: I’m not sure ASTER will definitely be the 2017 BNB. So, flipping the question around—those who are bearish on ASTER, are you 100% certain it’s worthless? Or, do you really dare to guarantee that, seven years from now, ASTER won’t become someone else’s BNB?
There’s actually a game of probability hidden here. Suppose the chance of ASTER becoming an asset on the level of BNB is only 1%. That seems very low. But if you only invest 0.5 to 1 USDT and give it seven years?
Look at the growth trajectories of BTC, ETH, BNB—achieving 1000x to 10,000x increases within seven years. Even with the most conservative target of 1000x, a 1% success probability isn’t low at all.
Using 100 yuan to buy 100 ASTER tokens, if successful, you could become a millionaire. Invest 1000 yuan, and you might reach assets worth tens of millions. That kind of odds justifies giving it a try.
Some might say, ASTER has strong backing with good concepts, and well-known industry figures are involved and holding positions. Honestly, even if these are all superficial—if ASTER is truly just air—then from a pure probability perspective, this gamble is still worth taking.
Just look at history. What was DOGE back in the day? An infinite inflation joke, giving you a hundred million coins was considered a waste of space. But after seven years, how many millionaires did it create?
Later, SHIB was even more outrageous—launched with a trillion tokens, everyone thought it was dead on arrival, with no fundamentals supporting it. And what happened? An investor bought in with 7000 yuan, held for 400 days, and ended up with an account showing 14.5 billion. That’s a lesson SHIB taught the market.
It demonstrated a profound truth: sometimes, the consensus of fools can change the market. I never consider myself a wise investor; trading derivatives often leads to liquidation. But I am very clear on one thing: in crypto, the logic of small long-term holdings generating excess returns is valid.
Now, ASTER is right in front of us. With just 1000 yuan principal, a 7-year cycle, and a 1% success probability, you could achieve financial freedom. Is there still any need to hesitate?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
17 Likes
Reward
17
7
1
Share
Comment
0/400
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
· 4h ago
To be honest, I can understand this logic, but it still sounds like gambling.
Relying solely on a 1% chance to achieve financial freedom... that mindset is truly extraordinary.
The story of DOGE and SHIB has been told a hundred times; everyone wants to be the guy who turned 7,000 into 14.5 billion.
The problem is, the probability theory explanation is probably the best way to convince oneself.
I just want to ask, for those coins that went to zero, did anyone also do the math like this?
View OriginalReply0
ChainSauceMaster
· 6h ago
Buddy, I have to say, this logic sounds a bit like self-brainwashing.
---
Both DOGE and SHIB are once-in-a-lifetime lucky ones. Why don’t you talk about the ten thousand coins that got buried?
---
A 1% chance sounds good, but how do you bet? Is it all based on intuition?
---
Basically, it’s still a gambler’s mentality, just putting a probability theory coat on it.
---
Really willing to gamble for 7 years? I don’t have that patience.
---
This sounds just like the logic of SHIB retail investors; often, the last to buy in are the latercomers.
---
Is long-term holding of small amounts with excess returns feasible? Only if you can really hold on until that day.
---
I also want to turn 1,000 yuan into ten million, but that dream is a bit expensive.
View OriginalReply0
BoredWatcher
· 6h ago
Oh my, I love this gambler's logic, just for this honest attitude
---
That's spot on, anyway it's all a probability game, so just play
---
That wave of 145 billion SHIB was truly incredible, I haven't seen anything so outrageous since
---
But what's the truth? Most people will still cut their losses before dawn in the end
---
A 1% success rate sounds low, but who can resist the temptation of a thousandfold return?
---
The key is controlling the principal, everyone, don't go all-in like
---
I just want to know, does this guy's number of margin calls exceed his number of profits, haha
---
The consensus of fools changes the market, this sentence is really excellent. By the way, what kind of fool am I?
---
What is the current price of ASTER? How many can I stockpile with 1000 yuan?
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetective
· 6h ago
Probability gambling, I bet you will gamble too.
---
This logic is indeed perfect, but it feels like everyone is betting on the fool's consensus to take the bait.
---
DOGE, SHIB, these freaks really change their fate, but survivor bias is truly deadly.
---
1% probability multiplied by 1000x returns, mathematically it looks correct, but in reality, half of the players are dead.
---
Zeroing out is unavoidable, but this is the game we play, so accept it.
---
Honestly, the ASTER thing is just a small gamble for fun, don't put all your hopes on it.
---
I love the fool's consensus phrase; the crypto world survives on this kind of thing.
---
It's that classic line of 1000 yuan in 7 years turning into a million, a standard phrase, but I just can't help wanting to get on board.
View OriginalReply0
On-ChainDiver
· 6h ago
That's right, the logic of probability theory is quite clear.
---
The story of DOGE and SHIB is indeed shocking, but can it be replicated this time...
---
I agree with long-term small holdings, the question is whether you can really hold on for 7 years.
---
The idiom "fools' consensus changes the market" hits hard.
---
A 1% success rate with millions in assets sounds great, but what about reality?
---
Instead of worrying about how ASTER will perform, why not just get on board?
---
Even Buffett has had failures, yet he still pursues 100% success here.
---
Frequent contract liquidations are still calculating probabilities; that confidence is commendable.
---
All the historical data being looked at are probably survivor bias.
---
1000 yuan over 7 years, if it really works out, I’ll believe in this red mouse scheme.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainTherapist
· 6h ago
Telling the truth, if Bitcoin can go to zero, why can't ASTER?
Honestly, instead of worrying about whether you have the confidence, it's better to calculate whether this deal is worth it.
A 1% chance to exchange for millions, I think this bet is worth it.
The story of DOGE and SHIB, who dares to say it won't happen again?
Small amounts for the long term, this logic has long been proven in the crypto world.
Rather than pessimism, ask yourself if you're willing to bet this 1%.
With so many reversals in history, why must ASTER necessarily be that piece of worthless paper?
I’ve been through frequent contract explosions and I’m not afraid; the only difference is mindset.
Holding long-term is betting on a small probability, but the odds are truly incredible.
View OriginalReply0
BagHolderTillRetire
· 7h ago
Basically, it's gambling. A 1% chance to win a million, and the odds are indeed tempting.
But I still believe that those who truly make big money are never relying on this kind of "probability theory" to buy air coins, but rather those who genuinely understand the projects.
DOGE and SHIB are survivor bias; the number of coins that have died is ten thousand times more.
Be careful not to become the next person "stuck until retirement," brother.
Pure probability game—win and boast for a lifetime, lose and pretend it never happened.
I still think a 1% success rate is a bit optimistic; in reality, less than 1% of coins survive beyond 7 years.
Wait, you said only invest 1000 yuan? Then it's not a loss, just treat it as buying a lottery ticket.
This logic is ridiculous; since everything could go to zero, what's the difference between investing in BTC and ASTER?
It mainly depends on whether there is a real application scenario; relying solely on fool's consensus will eventually backfire.
Betting on guarantees is just talk; no one in the crypto world can be 100% certain of anything.
It sounds good, but the core is still encouraging all-in on small-cap coins. I've heard this argument countless times.
Maybe if you bet right, it can really change your fate, but most people will end up trapping themselves in the end.
My friend recently asked me: You’re so optimistic about ASTER, do you really believe it could become the next BNB? If you’re so confident, why keep adding to your position?
My answer is: I have no certainty at all. Honestly, ASTER could completely go to zero.
His expression at the time was a bit hard to hide—since it could go to zero, why bother buying more?
At first glance, this question seems reasonable; upon reflection, it’s clear that the person asking has somewhat mythologized investing.
Whether trading cryptocurrencies or stocks, no one can achieve a 100% success rate. Even Warren Buffett can’t. Plus, the risks in crypto are obviously greater than in stocks. In the stock market, there are safe-haven options like blue-chip stocks; in the crypto world? BTC itself carries a theoretical risk of going to zero, let alone latecomers like ASTER.
But that’s exactly the charm of crypto assets—their potential returns can far surpass traditional stock markets.
The key question is this: I’m not sure ASTER will definitely be the 2017 BNB. So, flipping the question around—those who are bearish on ASTER, are you 100% certain it’s worthless? Or, do you really dare to guarantee that, seven years from now, ASTER won’t become someone else’s BNB?
There’s actually a game of probability hidden here. Suppose the chance of ASTER becoming an asset on the level of BNB is only 1%. That seems very low. But if you only invest 0.5 to 1 USDT and give it seven years?
Look at the growth trajectories of BTC, ETH, BNB—achieving 1000x to 10,000x increases within seven years. Even with the most conservative target of 1000x, a 1% success probability isn’t low at all.
Using 100 yuan to buy 100 ASTER tokens, if successful, you could become a millionaire. Invest 1000 yuan, and you might reach assets worth tens of millions. That kind of odds justifies giving it a try.
Some might say, ASTER has strong backing with good concepts, and well-known industry figures are involved and holding positions. Honestly, even if these are all superficial—if ASTER is truly just air—then from a pure probability perspective, this gamble is still worth taking.
Just look at history. What was DOGE back in the day? An infinite inflation joke, giving you a hundred million coins was considered a waste of space. But after seven years, how many millionaires did it create?
Later, SHIB was even more outrageous—launched with a trillion tokens, everyone thought it was dead on arrival, with no fundamentals supporting it. And what happened? An investor bought in with 7000 yuan, held for 400 days, and ended up with an account showing 14.5 billion. That’s a lesson SHIB taught the market.
It demonstrated a profound truth: sometimes, the consensus of fools can change the market. I never consider myself a wise investor; trading derivatives often leads to liquidation. But I am very clear on one thing: in crypto, the logic of small long-term holdings generating excess returns is valid.
Now, ASTER is right in front of us. With just 1000 yuan principal, a 7-year cycle, and a 1% success probability, you could achieve financial freedom. Is there still any need to hesitate?