2025-12-25 09:21:30

Doing transactions and selling products, what truly moves people has never been flowery words, but those hard-to-fake "hard signals."

When information asymmetry exists, market participants' choices are actually quite simple:

**Verifiable** — Third parties can genuinely verify, not just one-sided promotion
**Costly** — The cost of faking is evident, making deception unprofitable
**Instantly understandable** — No need to think hard; it can be intuitively compared

Here's a real-world example: a user gets stung by a bee and their face swells. This photo is more convincing than a hundred repetitions of "Our products are absolutely natural and harmless." Real events are the strongest endorsement.

So, if you want to build market trust, don't just talk. Design your costs — third-party testing and certification, complete traceability chain, willingness to gamble on results, unconditional return and exchange policies. These are the true reasons customers will place orders.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

CryptoPhoenix

· 9h ago

Really, saying more is less effective than doing real work. On-chain data never lies, and that's what I trust.

View OriginalReply0

MidnightGenesis

· 9h ago

On-chain data is the least likely to deceive... more valuable than all whitepapers

View OriginalReply0

ProbablyNothing

· 9h ago

That's right, just talking tough is really useless. I've seen too many projects boast extravagantly, only to end up with nothing. As I always say, let the data speak, and only those who dare to verify on-chain are true projects.

View OriginalReply0

RugPullProphet

· 9h ago

Oh, that's right. Just talking without action is useless. The Web3 space most lacks this kind of strong signal. Look at those project teams bragging every day, but when you check the on-chain data, it's all just air.

View OriginalReply0

OPsychology

· 9h ago

At the end of the day, it's all about the data; no matter how much nonsense is spoken, it can't compare to a real screenshot. Honestly, I've been immune to those flashy promotional texts for a long time. What really moves me is seeing someone dare to make a flag and dare to do third-party verification. On-chain verification is even more critical in Web3. With transparency laid out there, who dares to fake? --- Speaking of which, many project teams are still figuring out how to hype more aggressively rather than how to make their costs more robust. That's truly a missed opportunity. --- The example of the bee stinging its face is hilarious; firsthand experience always beats a thousand slogans. --- The concept of traceability links sounds simple, but projects that achieve complete transparency are few and far between... --- The essence of building trust is to reduce others' verification costs. The simpler and more intuitive it is, the easier it is for people to place an order.

View OriginalReply0

UnruggableChad

· 10h ago

Honestly, this logic is the most popular in the crypto circle. Anyone can talk on paper, but only those willing to put real money are the real players. --- Third-party verification is truly unbeatable. Otherwise, many projects boast extravagantly, but in the end, they just cut the leeks. --- The higher the cost, the stronger the signal. That’s why on-chain data is more convincing than any press release. --- Nice words are not as good as looking at the data. Things like exiting liquidity and holding periods can’t fool people. --- The example of bee stings is hilarious, haha. Live evidence is more useful than a thousand promises. --- The essence of Web3 is to eliminate this information gap. Verifiable, transparent, high cost... these are the rules of the game. --- The most lacking thing in the crypto circle is this kind of hard signal. Watching project teams blow air every day, how many are truly willing to bet on the outcome?

View OriginalReply0