Recently, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Basset discussed Fed reform on the All-In Podcast, offering sharp insights but with a polished delivery. His main point is that the Central Bank needs to shift its focus from "precise control" to "flexible response."



**New Ideas on Inflation Targets**

Bessent believes that once inflation stabilizes around 2%, there is no need to fixate on that precise number. The economic system itself is dynamic and cannot be perfectly controlled like in a laboratory. Rather than aiming for an exact figure like 2.000%, it is better to adopt a range system—such as locking it in between 1%-3% or 1.5%-2.5%. This not only stabilizes expectations but also leaves reasonable flexibility for policymakers.

Of course, he also cautiously mentioned that changing the target at this stage would damage the Central Bank's credibility, so such an adjustment must wait for the right timing.

**Bitmap Issue: Signal Overly Sensitive**

Besant has strong opinions about the dot plot (interest rate forecast chart) released by Fed officials. This tool was originally intended to enhance transparency, but instead made the market jittery—when officials casually revise a prediction, Wall Street experiences significant fluctuations. He suggests that the new Fed chair might consider eliminating or simplifying such forward guidance, replacing it with clearer and more direct communication.

Regarding the candidates for the next chairman, the industry is generally focused on Kevin Warsh, Kevin Hassett, and Chris Waller. Their common characteristic is that they tend to favor a moderate contraction of Central Bank power, rather than expansionary policy interventions.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NFTRegrettervip
· 14h ago
Ha, it's that "flexibility" rhetoric again, which basically means leaving a way out for themselves. The dot matrix chart is indeed a joke; the market watches this thing twenty-four hours a day, and a cough from officials can trigger a riot. What's the point of stubbornly sticking to a 2% target? The economy can't be that precise; it would be better to just say we aim to control it within this range. Those candidates all want to consolidate power; that's the core issue... it's a power game.
View OriginalReply0
LayerZeroHerovip
· 14h ago
Haha, that's right. The pixel graph is just a time bomb. As soon as the officials update the prediction market, it directly goes To da moon.
View OriginalReply0
StableCoinKarenvip
· 14h ago
The pixel art is really a joke; when officials change a number, Wall Street goes crazy. It would be better if they just kept quiet.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiAlchemistvip
· 14h ago
*adjusts alchemical instruments* the fed's obsession with 2.000% precision is basically asking for volatility transmutation... they're trying to control what should flow organically through protocol design instead
Reply0
SatoshiLeftOnReadvip
· 14h ago
Hmm... it's just that I want to give the market more flexibility and less of a precision-guided feeling? It sounds reasonable, but when this trap theory is actually implemented, the difficulty will be another matter.
View OriginalReply0
StakeHouseDirectorvip
· 14h ago
The bitmap is really amazing; officials can just make a random prediction and blow up the market. It would be better to just be straightforward.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSpyvip
· 14h ago
Oh, the pixel art is really a joke, as soon as the market sees it, it just goes crazy haha
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)