Now everyone should be asking the same question: What new tricks can BTC still play on-chain?

Actually, during this period, I've been thinking about why we keep insisting on doing BTCFi, yet we always fall into the old traps of fragmentation, cross-chain risks, and liquidity collapse. It wasn't until I refocused on Starknet that I realized someone had turned the whole thing into a "closed-loop ecosystem" rather than a bunch of pieced-together functional modules.

👉Come in to see the detailed gameplay of BTCFi:

@Starknet Now integrate all the possibilities of BTC into the same system:
• Staking
• Lending
• LP Market Making
• Automated Yield Vault
• BTC collateral lending
• Multi-asset cross-chain integration (tBTC, LBTC, SolvBTC, etc.)

These are not isolated products, but a structured operating revenue engine. With an additional 100 million STRK incentives, it connects real transaction fees, real liquidity, and real lending demand, making the production of BTC verifiable, compoundable, and cyclical for the first time.

Watching the operation of this ecosystem, I suddenly understood that so-called BTCFi is not about creating a function, but about allowing Bitcoin to flow on-chain like blood.

Just like the unexpectedly popular "Good morning" of the early morning, sometimes the real energy comes from that layer of silent flow.