This morning I woke up thinking about a question: disputes can ruin all transactions, especially when money is involved.

In traditional contracts, we hide the contentious clauses in the fine print and then hope we never have to use them. This trick works fine in transactions between people—after all, there is plenty of time to haggle and discuss slowly over weeks or even months.

But what happens when machines take over? Funds are transferred in milliseconds, decisions are executed in an instant, and transactions are completed in the blink of an eye. The traditional system can no longer keep up.

Kite's idea is quite interesting: to have "agents" (which can be understood as applications, robots, or business entities) lock in the rules of dispute before any work begins. It's not about arguing after the fact, but rather agreeing on the rules of the game in advance. This way, even in a fast-paced environment dominated by machines, disputes can be resolved quickly along the established paths, preventing the entire system from descending into chaos.