Musk's departure from the administration might've just thrown a wrench into the whole government efficiency overhaul. Word on the street is his exit seriously weakened the push to trim down the bureaucratic monster that's been choking progress for years. DOGE—whether you're thinking crypto or that government efficiency thing—just lost one of its biggest champions in the room where decisions happen. Without that tech billionaire energy driving reforms from the inside, the massive restructuring effort could be hitting some serious roadblocks. Makes you wonder if the momentum for shaking up outdated systems just took a major hit. The timing couldn't be worse for anyone hoping to see real institutional change.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SelfRugger
· 6h ago
This really has been sent, without him pushing the DOGE trap reform, it's basically crippled.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanLarry
· 17h ago
nah this is just opportunity cost theatre tbh. musk leaves, suddenly everyone's shocked? the real mvp move was extracting maximum value extraction before the exit anyway. classic.
Reply0
TokenUnlocker
· 11-30 00:50
It's a bit foggy, this wave of DOGE is really hanging in the balance.
View OriginalReply0
MergeConflict
· 11-30 00:49
Haha, it's another palace intrigue drama. Musk's departure makes me feel that the DOGE situation might not be so absolute.
View OriginalReply0
PseudoIntellectual
· 11-30 00:49
Well... with Musk gone, it seems that DOGE is going to cool off. No one is pushing for reform from within, and the efficiency reform is likely to be countered by the bureaucratic institutions.
View OriginalReply0
ProbablyNothing
· 11-30 00:43
Damn, as soon as Musk left, DOGE is doomed? This guy really is the key man!
View OriginalReply0
ChainSherlockGirl
· 11-30 00:43
According to my analysis, this wave of operations indeed has a bit of a "plot twist" flavor... What does the exit of Large Investors usually mean? Retail investors should be cautious.
---
Regarding DOGE, to put it simply, it just lacks an "inside man" pushing it, and the momentum for reform is directly cut off.
---
Ha, so ultimately, the ones who can truly drive system-level changes are still those who hold the power of discourse. When one person leaves, the entire narrative framework collapses.
---
Interestingly, before each of these "key figures exit", has anyone tracked the movements of wallet addresses? Risk warning: personal speculation.
---
The matter of reform momentum is like the Holdings of on-chain Large Investors — once the core players withdraw, it becomes very difficult to continue the subsequent story.
---
Wait, this rhythm... does it have another meaning? Are other forces seizing the opportunity to rise? To be continued.
View OriginalReply0
ImaginaryWhale
· 11-30 00:23
Laughing to death, as soon as Musk left, DOGE directly pumped down, this wave is indeed a bit absurd.
Musk's departure from the administration might've just thrown a wrench into the whole government efficiency overhaul. Word on the street is his exit seriously weakened the push to trim down the bureaucratic monster that's been choking progress for years. DOGE—whether you're thinking crypto or that government efficiency thing—just lost one of its biggest champions in the room where decisions happen. Without that tech billionaire energy driving reforms from the inside, the massive restructuring effort could be hitting some serious roadblocks. Makes you wonder if the momentum for shaking up outdated systems just took a major hit. The timing couldn't be worse for anyone hoping to see real institutional change.