The U.S. president recently floated a bold idea: potentially eliminating income tax altogether, banking on tariff revenues to fill the gap. This proposal represents a massive shift in fiscal strategy, reminiscent of pre-1913 America when tariffs were the primary revenue source.
The math behind this is wild. Current U.S. income tax generates around $2+ trillion annually, while tariff income sits closer to $80-100 billion. Even aggressive tariff hikes would struggle to bridge that canyon without triggering serious trade wars and consumer price inflation.
For markets, this kind of policy shake-up creates uncertainty. Crypto traders should watch closely—major tax overhauls historically drive capital flows as investors hunt for new shelters. If income tax disappears but tariffs spike, imported goods get pricier, potentially pushing inflation higher and influencing Fed decisions on rates.
Whether this becomes reality or just political theater remains uncertain, but the conversation alone signals how unconventional economic thinking is entering mainstream policy debates.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
20 Likes
Reward
20
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ContractSurrender
· 22h ago
2 trillion versus 8 billion, this number is ridiculously far apart... Do you really think everyone is a fool?
View OriginalReply0
SignatureAnxiety
· 11-30 08:10
Wait, are we really relying on tariffs to fill a 20 trillion tax gap? How does that math work out? Do they really think we're idiots?
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_trauma
· 11-28 08:34
200 trillion versus 80 billion, this gap is huge... Is it going to be hyped again?
View OriginalReply0
SchrödingersNode
· 11-28 08:31
This math is ridiculous, 20 trillion versus 8 billion? How can we make up for that, can tariffs increase by 100 times?
View OriginalReply0
NFTHoarder
· 11-28 08:24
2 trillion vs 800 billion, this price difference is ridiculous, and they still want to make up for it through tariffs... wake up, dude.
View OriginalReply0
JustHodlIt
· 11-28 08:23
2 trillion to 800 billion, how do you calculate this math? Politicians really know how to tell stories.
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceNightmare
· 11-28 08:19
2 trillion versus 800 billion, the difference in these numbers is not small at all, I think it's precarious.
The U.S. president recently floated a bold idea: potentially eliminating income tax altogether, banking on tariff revenues to fill the gap. This proposal represents a massive shift in fiscal strategy, reminiscent of pre-1913 America when tariffs were the primary revenue source.
The math behind this is wild. Current U.S. income tax generates around $2+ trillion annually, while tariff income sits closer to $80-100 billion. Even aggressive tariff hikes would struggle to bridge that canyon without triggering serious trade wars and consumer price inflation.
For markets, this kind of policy shake-up creates uncertainty. Crypto traders should watch closely—major tax overhauls historically drive capital flows as investors hunt for new shelters. If income tax disappears but tariffs spike, imported goods get pricier, potentially pushing inflation higher and influencing Fed decisions on rates.
Whether this becomes reality or just political theater remains uncertain, but the conversation alone signals how unconventional economic thinking is entering mainstream policy debates.