#数字货币市场回升 Recently, the Fed's report revealed a big scoop - the top 100 banks and 100 non-bank institutions in the United States are surprisingly highly bound to third-party service providers. In other words, if a key service provider goes down, the entire market could collapse. This is not good news for $BTC.
What's the most heartbreaking finding in the report? Operational interruptions have become the biggest minefield. The crypto market is already fragile and is extremely sensitive to such "functional risks." Exchanges, custody platforms—aren't these infrastructures all supported by third-party services? Once problems arise, chain liquidation and liquidity exhaustion can happen in an instant.
Looking back at history, it's clear that this kind of non-price shock is the most lethal. In the short term, high-leverage funds will be forced to close positions, and volatility will be pushed to the max. $BTC is likely to test those areas with high leverage in the short term. If the liquidity below cannot hold, the "liquidity spiral," a deadly tactic that kills invisibly, will play out again. What's more troublesome is that if a third-party node goes down, risk-averse funds will rush to buy dollars, tightening global dollar liquidity, and Bitcoin, as a risk asset, will naturally suffer.
However, the rules of the game are changing.
The market is now not only focused on financial risks, but also on the stability of infrastructure and the concentration of supply chains, which are becoming new pricing standards. At this time, the decentralized nature of $BTC has become a highlight—it does not have to cater to the whims of any company or service provider, and can naturally bypass some of the pitfalls of the traditional financial system. When investors truly realize the value of system stability, Bitcoin, as the number one representative of decentralization, may attract a wave of funds seeking hedging and diversification.
Therefore, in terms of operation, one must be prepared for both possibilities: on one hand, closely monitor the risk signals from third-party services to prevent liquidity crashes; on the other hand, pay attention to the market's re-evaluation of the value of $BTC infrastructure. Be cautious in the short term, but if the trend is confirmed in the long term, one can consider positioning during dips.
The Fed's report has thrown a ticking time bomb into the crypto market, but it could also be a turning point. Risks and opportunities always coexist; it all depends on how you respond.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
2
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasFeePhobia
· 11-27 08:19
To be honest, the concentration of third-party service providers should have been liquidated long ago, and it's a bit late to release the report now.
If this wave of liquidity crunch really comes, leveraged traders are probably going to be devastated.
Bitcoin decentralization is a good card to play; in the long term, there is still room for imagination.
View OriginalReply0
MemecoinTrader
· 11-27 08:08
nah the fed's basically just leaked their own playbook on why btc actually wins here. third-party collapse = systemic risk narrative suddenly becomes btc's strongest marketing angle. pretty bullish if you ask me
#数字货币市场回升 Recently, the Fed's report revealed a big scoop - the top 100 banks and 100 non-bank institutions in the United States are surprisingly highly bound to third-party service providers. In other words, if a key service provider goes down, the entire market could collapse. This is not good news for $BTC.
What's the most heartbreaking finding in the report? Operational interruptions have become the biggest minefield. The crypto market is already fragile and is extremely sensitive to such "functional risks." Exchanges, custody platforms—aren't these infrastructures all supported by third-party services? Once problems arise, chain liquidation and liquidity exhaustion can happen in an instant.
Looking back at history, it's clear that this kind of non-price shock is the most lethal. In the short term, high-leverage funds will be forced to close positions, and volatility will be pushed to the max. $BTC is likely to test those areas with high leverage in the short term. If the liquidity below cannot hold, the "liquidity spiral," a deadly tactic that kills invisibly, will play out again. What's more troublesome is that if a third-party node goes down, risk-averse funds will rush to buy dollars, tightening global dollar liquidity, and Bitcoin, as a risk asset, will naturally suffer.
However, the rules of the game are changing.
The market is now not only focused on financial risks, but also on the stability of infrastructure and the concentration of supply chains, which are becoming new pricing standards. At this time, the decentralized nature of $BTC has become a highlight—it does not have to cater to the whims of any company or service provider, and can naturally bypass some of the pitfalls of the traditional financial system. When investors truly realize the value of system stability, Bitcoin, as the number one representative of decentralization, may attract a wave of funds seeking hedging and diversification.
Therefore, in terms of operation, one must be prepared for both possibilities: on one hand, closely monitor the risk signals from third-party services to prevent liquidity crashes; on the other hand, pay attention to the market's re-evaluation of the value of $BTC infrastructure. Be cautious in the short term, but if the trend is confirmed in the long term, one can consider positioning during dips.
The Fed's report has thrown a ticking time bomb into the crypto market, but it could also be a turning point. Risks and opportunities always coexist; it all depends on how you respond.