Encouraging people to short an altcoin with a market capitalization of less than 30 million? That's a ruthless move.
You need to keep an eye on this coin, PIPPIN. The strategy for these types of small market capitalization coins is actually quite fixed—once the hype fades, the market makers will quietly accumulate, and once they have gathered enough chips, they will come back for another pump.
What if the market capitalization drops below 20 million? You might consider setting up a long position. Even if the original team doesn't pull it up, there will be wild speculators eyeing this piece of fat meat. After all, there hasn't been any movement for a long time, and a certain leading exchange might label it as high risk, which the speculators wouldn't want to see.
Interestingly, this coin started harvesting on the day it was launched. I checked the on-chain data yesterday, and the project team's wallet was completely still, while the active wallets kept moving. What does this indicate? The project team is still monitoring the market, they just haven't taken action yet.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GasWastingMaximalist
· 11-27 06:04
The tricks of small market capitalization coins are like this; market makers have to pretend to be dead before entering the scene.
Wait, the project party is completely unmoved? That's even more ridiculous.
PIPPIN is indeed worth following; below 20 million is the real entry point.
Advising to short a coin with a market capitalization of 30 million, this method is acceptable.
On-chain data doesn't lie; the active wallets moving indicate that someone is testing the waters.
Another old trick with small coins, boring.
View OriginalReply0
bridge_anxiety
· 11-26 03:52
The essence of low market capitalization coins' tricks is just the market maker's ATM, I've seen through PIPPIN a long time ago.
Wait a minute, the project party is completely still while the active Wallets are moving? This logic is a bit strange.
Only dare to catch a falling knife below 20 million? Come on, these kinds of coins can turn on you in an instant.
Lying in ambush long order? As soon as the risk label is attached, it's directly over, don't get trapped.
The deepest pit is this fantasy of "wild market maker catching a falling knife", wake up everyone.
View OriginalReply0
SatsStacking
· 11-24 06:50
This strategy is explained in detail, but do you really dare to take a position in a token with a $30 million market cap? The risk is a bit high.
I've been following PIPPIN too. It's pretty interesting on-chain, and the team's moves seem a bit intriguing.
Sell at $20 million? I'm afraid it might go to zero before any pump happens.
But your analysis logic is decent. This is indeed how small-cap tokens work—market makers accumulate and then pump in one go.
I usually just watch these kinds of tokens. I'm not putting real money into them.
View OriginalReply0
ContractFreelancer
· 11-24 06:42
The tricks of small market cap coins are really the same, market makers play their routines skillfully.
```
```
Lying in ambush for PIPPIN? Better look at the on-chain data, don’t just listen to the analysis.
```
```
The project party remains unmoved, uh... this is just absurd.
```
```
Only willing to act below 20 million? I think that's risky, once the risk label is hung, it's over.
```
```
Cutting suckers right after launch, I’ve long blacklisted such coins.
```
```
Active wallets moving around are actually more dangerous, retail investors shouldn’t follow the trend.
```
```
Are wild market makers eyeing this juicy piece? It could fall 50% in no time.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunter_9000
· 11-24 06:42
Small market capitalization coins are like this, the drama of Accumulation and pump is played repeatedly.
With a market capitalization below 20 million, it can really lie in ambush, and even the wild market makers are tempted.
Is the project party motionless? That means they are waiting for an opportunity.
That said, I've seen this routine too many times, it still depends on on-chain data to speak.
Lying in ambush for long orders requires timing, otherwise, one will also be played for suckers.
In a market like PIPPIN, once the heat dissipates, it becomes lifeless, making it really hard to judge.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiAlchemist
· 11-24 06:40
the transmutation mechanics here are fascinating—watching these low-cap tokens reveal their true nature through on-chain alchemy. pippin's got that classic pooled liquidity signature... patience rewards the rigorous observer.
Reply0
LostBetweenChains
· 11-24 06:36
Low market cap coins are just like a field waiting to be reaped.
Same old trick—once the hype fades, they start accumulating.
PIPPIN... might only be worth considering after it drops even harder.
On-chain data tells the story, the project team is still watching closely.
Opportunities probably only come when it's below 20 million.
Would you really dare play with these coins? The risk label will be slapped on sooner or later.
Active wallets are moving, whales are manipulating, retail investors should stay out.
View OriginalReply0
DefiVeteran
· 11-24 06:30
The market maker's tricks are indeed slick, but I generally don't touch these small coins.
The PIPPIN plate is too small, and the risks are terrifying.
Dare to enter below 20 million? You've got some guts, buddy.
The project party staying completely still is the most frightening, indicating they're waiting for something.
Small coins are high risk; it's easy to make quick money but even easier to lose it faster.
On-chain data can be misleading; market makers aren't fools.
I'm tired of these tricks; let's change the approach.
Watching the market without acting? That means a big move is brewing.
I avoid those with a market capitalization around 30 million; I don't have the leisure to gamble.
More active wallets ≠ someone catching the falling knife; don't be fooled by appearances.
View OriginalReply0
DuskSurfer
· 11-24 06:25
I have seen many small market capitalization traps, and this time PIPPIN is indeed a bit interesting. The project party is playing dead and not taking action, while the active wallets are having a blast, in simple terms, they are just waiting for the right opportunity.
Wait a minute, advising to short a coin worth thirty million? How lacking in confidence must one be? I still prefer those kinds that have market makers watching over them, at least it proves that someone wants to make money.
Encouraging people to short an altcoin with a market capitalization of less than 30 million? That's a ruthless move.
You need to keep an eye on this coin, PIPPIN. The strategy for these types of small market capitalization coins is actually quite fixed—once the hype fades, the market makers will quietly accumulate, and once they have gathered enough chips, they will come back for another pump.
What if the market capitalization drops below 20 million? You might consider setting up a long position. Even if the original team doesn't pull it up, there will be wild speculators eyeing this piece of fat meat. After all, there hasn't been any movement for a long time, and a certain leading exchange might label it as high risk, which the speculators wouldn't want to see.
Interestingly, this coin started harvesting on the day it was launched. I checked the on-chain data yesterday, and the project team's wallet was completely still, while the active wallets kept moving. What does this indicate? The project team is still monitoring the market, they just haven't taken action yet.