Here's a thesis that actually tracks with the timeline: Washington's crypto stack is growing through confiscations, not market buys.
The evidence? Look at the asset grabs targeting Cambodia's Prince Holding Group and its founder Chen Zhi. Those seizures kicked off around...
If you're connecting dots on how governments are building positions, this enforcement angle makes way more sense than any official accumulation narrative.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
liquidation_watcher
· 11-23 18:18
Wait, is this logic really true? The government directly confiscating and hoarding coins is even more ruthless than outright purchases? Does that mean those previously disclosed holdings data should all be questioned...
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinEnjoyer
· 11-23 01:02
Damn, this logic is insane... The government buying the dip directly is basically confiscation—way cheaper than paying for it.
View OriginalReply0
ForkInTheRoad
· 11-23 00:41
Wait, are you saying the government is directly seizing Coin Hoarding? That's even harsher than buying on the surface, it's basically legal robbery.
View OriginalReply0
OptionWhisperer
· 11-23 00:34
Wait, the U.S. government is directly seizing assets to do Coin Hoarding? This logic is absurd but somehow seems to make sense...
Here's a thesis that actually tracks with the timeline: Washington's crypto stack is growing through confiscations, not market buys.
The evidence? Look at the asset grabs targeting Cambodia's Prince Holding Group and its founder Chen Zhi. Those seizures kicked off around...
If you're connecting dots on how governments are building positions, this enforcement angle makes way more sense than any official accumulation narrative.