There's a project that secured $30 million from top-tier venture capital firms. Sounds impressive, right? Here's the twist: roughly 60% of its entire airdrop ended up in the hands of a single entity operating through 14,000 different addresses.



Wait, what?

This raises some serious questions about aPriori's token distribution. When you see this level of address clustering, you're either looking at an elaborate sybil attack or some coordinated farming operation that completely gamed the airdrop mechanics.

Either way, the numbers don't lie. One actor walking away with over half the allocation? That's not decentralization—that's concentration with extra steps. The community deserves answers about how this slipped through their detection systems.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
BuyTheTop
· 2025-11-14 07:59
Frauds are like family.
View OriginalReply0
DeepRabbitHole
· 2025-11-13 22:10
The Airdrop has all been taken away by hackers.
View OriginalReply0
TooScaredToSell
· 2025-11-11 19:01
Garbage Airdrop, here comes another play people for suckers.
View OriginalReply0
SchrodingerAirdrop
· 2025-11-11 19:01
It's another case of the project team staging their own performance.
View OriginalReply0
SerNgmi
· 2025-11-11 19:01
The show effect is achieved.
View OriginalReply0
FlashLoanKing
· 2025-11-11 18:51
This move is 6 out of 6.
View OriginalReply0
ForkYouPayMe
· 2025-11-11 18:46
play people for suckers and that's it
View OriginalReply0
DisillusiionOracle
· 2025-11-11 18:39
Are the suckers being played for suckers again?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin