I've made plenty of questionable decisions, not gonna lie. But even I wouldn't go this far:



Taking out a loan from your father-in-law? Sure. Using your high-value NFTs as collateral? Risky, but okay. Literally sending those NFTs straight to his wallet instead of using a proper escrow? That's wild.

Now those assets are worth basically nothing because his account got compromised. And somehow this is supposed to make sense? There's a limit to how much nonsense you can justify, and this crosses every line.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 9
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
ProposalManiacvip
· 2025-11-14 06:31
Historically, old masters are easy to deceive when it comes to others' wives, but wallets are hard to retrieve.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6bc33122vip
· 2025-11-14 02:31
It's a tax on intelligence.
View OriginalReply0
NftRegretMachinevip
· 2025-11-12 00:04
Buddy, isn't this just a freebie?
View OriginalReply0
GasGuzzlervip
· 2025-11-11 12:10
nah bro this dumb af fr
Reply0
Layer2Arbitrageurvip
· 2025-11-11 12:10
lol imagine not using a trustless escrow protocol. ngmi fr.
Reply0
GameFiCriticvip
· 2025-11-11 12:06
Another leek harvested by the IQ tax.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichvip
· 2025-11-11 12:01
Laughing to death, have you finished paying the IQ tax?
View OriginalReply0
hodl_therapistvip
· 2025-11-11 11:53
It turns out that a person can really be this silly.
View OriginalReply0
Ser_This_Is_A_Casinovip
· 2025-11-11 11:48
This one was cut too harshly, alright.
View OriginalReply0
View More
  • Pin