VSMAX: A Closer Look at Vanguard's Small-Cap Index Fund

robot
Abstract generation in progress

Searching for a solid Index fund? Vanguard Small-Cap Index Admiral (VSMAX) might catch your eye - though I have some reservations about its performance. While not tracked by Zacks Mutual Fund Rank, I’ve examined its performance, volatility, and cost structure to determine if it deserves a place in your portfolio.

VSMAX emerged in November 2000 under Vanguard Group’s umbrella and has since amassed approximately $55.87 billion in assets. William Coleman has managed the fund since April 2016, but his tenure hasn’t produced exceptional results.

Performance-wise, VSMAX delivers a mediocre 5-year annualized return of 9.6%, placing it merely in the middle third among peers. Its 3-year return of 3.22% follows the same underwhelming pattern. These numbers don’t exactly scream “market beater” to me.

What concerns me more is the volatility. With a 3-year standard deviation of 21.06% and 5-year of 22.83% (higher than category averages), VSMAX subjects investors to more turbulence than necessary. Coupled with a beta of 1.14, you’re signing up for more market volatility than the S&P 500.

The negative alpha of -5.55 over five years particularly troubles me. This suggests management struggles to select securities that outperform benchmarks - a fundamental issue that should give potential investors pause.

Currently, VSMAX holds about 89.16% in stocks with an average market cap of $8.71 billion, focusing heavily on Finance, Industrial Cyclical, and Technology sectors. The 12% turnover rate is relatively low, showing management isn’t frantically trading.

The fund’s one saving grace? Its expense ratio of 0.05% sits well below the category average of 94%, making it genuinely affordable. Initial investment requirements are reasonable at $3,000, with subsequent minimums of $1.

I’m not entirely sold on VSMAX. While the low fees are attractive, the middling performance, higher volatility, and negative alpha make me question whether this fund deserves prime position in a well-constructed portfolio. For small-cap exposure, I’d consider alternatives that might deliver better risk-adjusted returns.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin