Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
The difference between $BMNR and $SBET
Yesterday, Sister Wood bought 4 million shares of BMNR stock, igniting the entire community's debate over the ultimate king of the ETH strategic reserves battle between SBET and BMNR.
Both are centered around the business model of earning staking rewards by purchasing and staking ETH.
The differences are mainly reflected in two aspects.
1⃣️The difference of team leaders
sbet, with Ethereum co-founder Lubin as a key figure, has attracted more Web3 users and new capital infusion.
And bmnr, with Tom Lee from Wall Street as the core figure, drives more old money to be injected through his influence.
2⃣️Different financing methods
sbet uses private equity and public market financing to purchase ETH and stake for returns.
bmnr only raises funds through private equity financing to acquire ETH and stake it for returns.
From the team members' perspective, one side represents the new wealth of web3, while the other side represents the entry of old Wall Street money.
sbet focuses more on obtaining higher staking rewards through technical capabilities, Lubin's familiarity with the ETH network, and individual influence within the ETH community.
BMNR boldly claims through hard power that it intends to hold 5% of the total ETH supply, demonstrating its firm belief in the future value of ETH.
Acquiring ETH in the short term must be based on hard power. Capital is the moat. Whoever can finance faster and on a larger scale will take the lead and gain pricing power.
Starting from this point, the speed of sbet may actually be faster. However, sbet's financing through capital increase and share expansion is not very friendly to shareholders, and the stock price may not necessarily perform well. But it will finance at the fastest speed and is likely to hold the most eth. Additionally, with Lubin's influence in the eth ecosystem, it significantly increases sbet's eth staking cash flow income.
And bmnr may attract more Wall Street capital entering the game by purchasing bmnr stocks, betting on this feast.
So I personally believe that in terms of the company's business model and cash flow, SBET will perform better, but the stock price and shareholder returns may not be as good as BMNR.
In the end, the ultimate beneficiaries are all ETH.
Sister Wood is about to step down, and ETH 10k is just around the corner❗