Yesterday, the Newton project officially announced the end of the Testnet phase, which makes me feel somewhat regretful. Despite participating in activities like dice and minesweeping every day and completing various tasks on time, my final score only accumulated to 4300 points.
Following closely, the project team quickly made a substantial response, raising the originally planned airdrop reward ratio from 0.75% to 0.9%. I personally believe that this is not just a simple increase in rewards, but a clear affirmation of the genuine participants and the popularity of the Newton project within the community.
In this event, not only did users from the Chinese community maintain a high frequency of content output, but almost all language communities were actively discussing topics related to Newton. The Korean community was particularly active, and those users who continued to build content around smart AI agents and crypto user experience also received an additional 0.05% reward allocation.
This reminds me of the "builder-first, narrative-driven" concept proposed by the project team. From my understanding, Newton's distribution logic is not purely traffic-oriented, but rather focuses on who is creating valuable narratives, as they are the ones who can anchor true value. Whether this understanding is accurate still needs further confirmation from the project team.
Personally, I have been actively involved since the beginning of April, from the initial mine-sweeping activities to completing various tasks, from content creation to maintaining the rhythm, consistently keeping updated and engaged. This long-term participation experience has given me a deeper understanding of the project.
Throughout the process, the community's level of activity and enthusiasm for participation has indeed been impressive, which may also be an important consideration for the project team in deciding to increase the airdrop ratio. This emphasis on the distribution mechanism of real participation and content value may become an important reference for community building in future Web3 projects.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Yesterday, the Newton project officially announced the end of the Testnet phase, which makes me feel somewhat regretful. Despite participating in activities like dice and minesweeping every day and completing various tasks on time, my final score only accumulated to 4300 points.
Following closely, the project team quickly made a substantial response, raising the originally planned airdrop reward ratio from 0.75% to 0.9%. I personally believe that this is not just a simple increase in rewards, but a clear affirmation of the genuine participants and the popularity of the Newton project within the community.
In this event, not only did users from the Chinese community maintain a high frequency of content output, but almost all language communities were actively discussing topics related to Newton. The Korean community was particularly active, and those users who continued to build content around smart AI agents and crypto user experience also received an additional 0.05% reward allocation.
This reminds me of the "builder-first, narrative-driven" concept proposed by the project team. From my understanding, Newton's distribution logic is not purely traffic-oriented, but rather focuses on who is creating valuable narratives, as they are the ones who can anchor true value. Whether this understanding is accurate still needs further confirmation from the project team.
Personally, I have been actively involved since the beginning of April, from the initial mine-sweeping activities to completing various tasks, from content creation to maintaining the rhythm, consistently keeping updated and engaged. This long-term participation experience has given me a deeper understanding of the project.
Throughout the process, the community's level of activity and enthusiasm for participation has indeed been impressive, which may also be an important consideration for the project team in deciding to increase the airdrop ratio. This emphasis on the distribution mechanism of real participation and content value may become an important reference for community building in future Web3 projects.