From Technical Gene to Ecological Awakening, the Rise of a New Infrastructure for the Value Internet
I. History is strikingly similar: A mirror comparison between SCDO and Ethereum
Ethereum in 2013:
Founder Vitalik wrote down the vision of a “world computer” in the white paper, but was mocked as a “toy” due to frequent vulnerabilities in smart contracts.
Early TPS was only 5 transactions per second, gas fees fluctuated wildly, and there were fewer than a hundred ecological applications.
SCDO in 2025:
The founding team anonymously released the “Blockchain 4.0 Technology Declaration,” using the ZPoW algorithm to break the monopoly on computing power.
The mainnet TPS stabilizes at over 1000, with more than 20 ecological applications, and the monthly average download rate of developer tools increases by 10%.
II. Technical Gene Decoding: How SCDO Inherits and Surpasses the Genes of Ethereum
1. The Evolutionary Revolution of Consensus Mechanisms
Ethereum Dilemma: The transition from PoW to PoS has led to a loss of computing power and increased centralization risks.
SCDO Plan: ZPoW algorithm enables fair competition between GPU/CPU (ASIC miner efficiency is only 12% higher than CPU)
Hybrid PoW+PoS mechanism, miners and token holders form a community of shared interests.
2. Practical Implementation of Sharding Technology
Ethereum Shortcomings: The sharding roadmap has been delayed multiple times, and the complexity of Layer 2 solutions is high.
SCDO Breakthrough: The mainnet natively supports 4 shards, with a theoretical TPS of up to 5000 (measured at over 2000)
Stem sub-chain protocol realizes “one chain with multiple scenarios”, reducing the development threshold by 80%
3. Dimensionality Reduction of the Developer Ecosystem
Ethereum Pain Points: Monopoly of Solidity language, high migration costs
SCDO Innovation: Fully compatible with EVM, with 30+ Ethereum DApps successfully migrated with zero code.
Launched SCDO SDK toolkit, reducing smart contract development cycle by 70%
, The underlying logic of value investing: Time is on the side of SCDO
1. Deepening of the technological moat
The research and development progress of quantum-resistant algorithms is 18 months ahead of the industry.
Sharding expansion roadmap clarified: 25 shards to be achieved by 2026, theoretical TPS exceeding 10,000.
2. Self-evolution of Economic Models
Deflationary mechanism: The annual inflation rate is reduced from 5% to 1.2%, and the burning rate is positively correlated with ecological growth
Value Capture: 5% of block rewards are specifically used for ecological construction, forming a positive cycle.
3. Misalignment Opportunities in Market Cycles
The current valuation is only 0.1% of Ethereum, but the growth rate of developers is three times that of the latter (2015)
The institutional holding ratio is less than 0.2%, far lower than Bitcoin’s 65% and Ethereum’s 38%.
5. The Truth Behind Those Doubts
Question 1: “Too few users, the ecosystem is not mature”
Fact: New users increased by 30% quarter-on-quarter in Q1 2025, with daily average transactions exceeding 10,000.
Benchmark: In 2017, Ethereum had only 80,000 DAU, while the current SCDO has reached its 15-fold growth.
Question 2: “The technical route is too complex”
Fact: The code open-source rate is 98%, and the number of stars on GitHub has surpassed 10,000 (Ethereum has 350,000).
Benchmark: The ZPoW algorithm has undergone a CertiK security audit, with a vulnerability rate of only 0.03%.
Question 3: “Lack of Killer Applications”
Fact: Scenarios such as supply chain traceability and privacy computing have already generated commercial revenue.
Benchmark: Ethereum also did not have killer applications in its early days, but its ecological self-organizing ability has already emerged.
6. Standing at the Crossroads of 2025: What Are We Witnessing?
1. Migration of Technical Paradigms
Shift from “performance competition” to “ecological value capture”
Upgrading from “Code is Law” to “Code and Business Coexist”
2. Reconstruction of Investment Logic
Early project valuation anchors shift from “team background” to “ecosystem scalability”
The long-term value assessment standard has shifted from “market capitalization ranking” to “sustainability of protocol revenue”.
3. Transfer of Power in the Industry
Rise of Developer Sovereignty: 60% of DApps on SCDO are initiated by the community
Dominance of the Asian market: 42% of on-chain transaction volume comes from Southeast Asia and Japan/Korea.
Hear the footsteps of the future in silence
The common trait of great projects is to solidify their foundations when no one is paying attention and to silently evolve amidst skepticism. The technical architecture, economic model, and ecological strategy of SCDO are replicating the purity of Ethereum’s early “code is law” while addressing the challenges of commercial implementation with a more pragmatic approach.
While the market is still debating whether “public chains are dead,” the developers of SCDO are building the infrastructure for the next generation of the value internet—there are no myths of overnight wealth, only the long-termism of technological believers. As Silicon Valley investor Chris Dixon said, “True innovation often arises in parallel universes outside of mainstream narratives.”
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
SCDO: The "Ethereum Moment" of the Blockchain world is approaching.
From Technical Gene to Ecological Awakening, the Rise of a New Infrastructure for the Value Internet
I. History is strikingly similar: A mirror comparison between SCDO and Ethereum
Ethereum in 2013:
SCDO in 2025:
II. Technical Gene Decoding: How SCDO Inherits and Surpasses the Genes of Ethereum
1. The Evolutionary Revolution of Consensus Mechanisms
2. Practical Implementation of Sharding Technology
3. Dimensionality Reduction of the Developer Ecosystem
, The underlying logic of value investing: Time is on the side of SCDO
1. Deepening of the technological moat
2. Self-evolution of Economic Models
3. Misalignment Opportunities in Market Cycles
5. The Truth Behind Those Doubts
Question 1: “Too few users, the ecosystem is not mature”
Question 2: “The technical route is too complex”
Question 3: “Lack of Killer Applications”
6. Standing at the Crossroads of 2025: What Are We Witnessing?
1. Migration of Technical Paradigms
2. Reconstruction of Investment Logic
3. Transfer of Power in the Industry
Hear the footsteps of the future in silence
The common trait of great projects is to solidify their foundations when no one is paying attention and to silently evolve amidst skepticism. The technical architecture, economic model, and ecological strategy of SCDO are replicating the purity of Ethereum’s early “code is law” while addressing the challenges of commercial implementation with a more pragmatic approach.
While the market is still debating whether “public chains are dead,” the developers of SCDO are building the infrastructure for the next generation of the value internet—there are no myths of overnight wealth, only the long-termism of technological believers. As Silicon Valley investor Chris Dixon said, “True innovation often arises in parallel universes outside of mainstream narratives.”