Introduction: SQUID vs UNI Investment Comparison
In the cryptocurrency market, SQUID vs UNI comparison has always been a topic that investors cannot avoid. The two not only have significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance, but also represent different cryptocurrency asset positioning.
SQUID (SQUID): Since its launch in 2021, it has gained market recognition as a meme token on the Binance Smart Chain (BSC).
UNI (UNI): Since its inception in 2020, it has been hailed as the first automated market-making protocol built on the Ethereum blockchain and is one of the cryptocurrencies with the highest global trading volume and market capitalization.
This article will comprehensively analyze the investment value comparison between SQUID and UNI, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and future predictions, and attempt to answer the question that investors are most concerned about:
"Which is the better buy right now?"
Here is the report based on the provided template and information:
I. Price History Comparison and Current Market Status
SQUID and UNI Historical Price Trends
- 2021: SQUID experienced a dramatic price surge and crash due to a rug pull incident, with the price falling from $2,861 to near zero.
- 2021: UNI reached its all-time high of $44.92 in May, influenced by the growing popularity of decentralized finance (DeFi).
- Comparative analysis: During the 2021 crypto bull market, SQUID went from an extreme high to almost worthless, while UNI demonstrated more stability, maintaining significant value despite market volatility.
Current Market Situation (2025-10-12)
- SQUID current price: $0.004644
- UNI current price: $5.84
- 24-hour trading volume: SQUID $244,196 vs UNI $17,883,317
- Market Sentiment Index (Fear & Greed Index): 24 (Extreme Fear)
Click to view real-time prices:

II. Core Factors Affecting SQUID vs UNI Investment Value
Supply Mechanism Comparison (Tokenomics)
- SQUID: Limited information available on supply mechanics
- UNI: Limited information available on supply mechanics
- 📌 Historical pattern: Insufficient data on how supply mechanisms drive price cycles.
Institutional Adoption and Market Applications
- Institutional holdings: Insufficient data on institutional preferences
- Enterprise adoption: Limited information on cross-border payment, settlement, and portfolio applications
- Regulatory attitudes: Limited information on regulatory positions across different countries
Technical Development and Ecosystem Building
- SQUID technical upgrades: Insufficient data on development trajectory
- UNI technical development: Insufficient data on development trajectory
- Ecosystem comparison: Limited information on DeFi, NFT, payment, and smart contract implementations
Macroeconomic Factors and Market Cycles
- Performance in inflationary environments: Limited data on anti-inflation properties
- Macroeconomic monetary policies: Insufficient information on how interest rates and USD index affect these tokens
- Geopolitical factors: Limited data on cross-border transaction demands and international situations
III. 2025-2030 Price Prediction: SQUID vs UNI
Short-term Prediction (2025)
- SQUID: Conservative $0.00320436 - $0.004644 | Optimistic $0.004644 - $0.00552636
- UNI: Conservative $3.82005 - $5.877 | Optimistic $5.877 - $6.40593
Mid-term Prediction (2027)
- SQUID may enter a growth phase, with expected prices ranging from $0.004280704524 to $0.008251213068
- UNI may enter a growth phase, with expected prices ranging from $5.390977977 to $8.29926872775
- Key drivers: Institutional capital inflow, ETFs, ecosystem development
Long-term Prediction (2030)
- SQUID: Base scenario $0.004782986572851 - $0.008857382542317 | Optimistic scenario $0.008857382542317 - $0.010806006701626
- UNI: Base scenario $5.688758008837134 - $9.8082034635123 | Optimistic scenario $9.8082034635123 - $12.162172294755252
View detailed price predictions for SQUID and UNI
Disclaimer
SQUID:
年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
2025 |
0.00552636 |
0.004644 |
0.00320436 |
0 |
2026 |
0.0073226592 |
0.00508518 |
0.0026951454 |
9 |
2027 |
0.008251213068 |
0.0062039196 |
0.004280704524 |
33 |
2028 |
0.0083117012841 |
0.007227566334 |
0.00592660439388 |
55 |
2029 |
0.009945131275584 |
0.00776963380905 |
0.004273298594977 |
67 |
2030 |
0.010806006701626 |
0.008857382542317 |
0.004782986572851 |
90 |
UNI:
年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
2025 |
6.40593 |
5.877 |
3.82005 |
0 |
2026 |
8.04531915 |
6.141465 |
5.7729771 |
5 |
2027 |
8.29926872775 |
7.093392075 |
5.390977977 |
21 |
2028 |
8.927743265595 |
7.696330401375 |
7.46544048933375 |
31 |
2029 |
11.3043700935396 |
8.312036833485 |
4.8209813634213 |
42 |
2030 |
12.162172294755252 |
9.8082034635123 |
5.688758008837134 |
67 |
IV. Investment Strategy Comparison: SQUID vs UNI
Long-term vs Short-term Investment Strategies
- SQUID: Suitable for high-risk tolerant investors seeking potential meme token gains
- UNI: Suitable for investors interested in DeFi ecosystem growth and governance participation
Risk Management and Asset Allocation
- Conservative investors: SQUID: 0% vs UNI: 5%
- Aggressive investors: SQUID: 1% vs UNI: 10%
- Hedging tools: Stablecoin allocation, options, cross-currency portfolios
V. Potential Risk Comparison
Market Risk
- SQUID: Extreme volatility and potential for sudden price collapse
- UNI: Subject to overall crypto market trends and DeFi sector performance
Technical Risk
- SQUID: Smart contract vulnerabilities, potential for further exploitation
- UNI: Scalability issues on Ethereum, network congestion
Regulatory Risk
- Global regulatory policies may have different impacts on both tokens, with UNI potentially facing more scrutiny due to its prominence in the DeFi space
VI. Conclusion: Which Is the Better Buy?
📌 Investment Value Summary:
- SQUID advantages: High-risk, high-reward potential for speculative traders
- UNI advantages: Established position in DeFi, governance rights, larger ecosystem
✅ Investment Advice:
- Novice investors: Consider UNI for a more established project with less extreme risk
- Experienced investors: Allocate a small portion to SQUID if seeking high-risk opportunities, maintain larger UNI position
- Institutional investors: Focus on UNI for its more established market presence and DeFi ecosystem role
⚠️ Risk Warning: The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile, and this article does not constitute investment advice.
None
VII. FAQ
Q1: What are the main differences between SQUID and UNI?
A: SQUID is a meme token on the Binance Smart Chain, while UNI is the governance token for Uniswap, a leading decentralized exchange on Ethereum. UNI has a larger market cap, higher trading volume, and is more established in the DeFi ecosystem.
Q2: Which token has shown more price stability historically?
A: UNI has demonstrated more price stability compared to SQUID. While UNI has experienced volatility, it has maintained significant value. SQUID, on the other hand, had a dramatic price surge and crash in 2021 due to a rug pull incident.
Q3: What are the current prices and trading volumes for SQUID and UNI?
A: As of 2025-10-12, SQUID's price is $0.004644 with a 24-hour trading volume of $244,196. UNI's price is $5.84 with a 24-hour trading volume of $17,883,317.
Q4: How do the investment strategies differ for SQUID and UNI?
A: SQUID is suitable for high-risk tolerant investors seeking potential meme token gains. UNI is more appropriate for investors interested in DeFi ecosystem growth and governance participation. Conservative investors might allocate 0% to SQUID and 5% to UNI, while aggressive investors might allocate 1% to SQUID and 10% to UNI.
Q5: What are the main risks associated with investing in SQUID and UNI?
A: SQUID carries extreme volatility risk and potential for sudden price collapse. UNI is subject to overall crypto market trends and DeFi sector performance. Both face regulatory risks, with UNI potentially facing more scrutiny due to its prominence in the DeFi space.
Q6: What are the long-term price predictions for SQUID and UNI by 2030?
A: For SQUID, the base scenario predicts a range of $0.004782986572851 to $0.008857382542317, with an optimistic scenario of up to $0.010806006701626. For UNI, the base scenario predicts a range of $5.688758008837134 to $9.8082034635123, with an optimistic scenario of up to $12.162172294755252.