Introduction: SNET vs MANA Investment Comparison
In the cryptocurrency market, SNET vs MANA comparison has always been a topic that investors cannot ignore. The two not only have significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance, but also represent different cryptocurrency positioning.
SNET (SNET): Since its launch in 2018, it has gained market recognition for its distributed shared cloud computing network.
MANA (MANA): Since its inception in 2017, it has been hailed as a virtual world platform based on blockchain, and is one of the cryptocurrencies with the highest global trading volume and market capitalization.
This article will comprehensively analyze the investment value comparison between SNET and MANA, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and future predictions, and attempt to answer the question that investors are most concerned about:
"Which is the better buy right now?"
I. Historical Price Comparison and Current Market Status
SNET (Coin A) and MANA (Coin B) Historical Price Trends
- 2021: MANA price surged to an all-time high of $5.85 due to the metaverse hype.
 
- 2025: SNET reached its lowest price of $0.000449 on February 9, 2025.
 
- Comparative analysis: During the recent market cycle, MANA dropped from its all-time high of $5.85 to the current price of $0.2263, while SNET has been trading at much lower price levels.
 
Current Market Situation (2025-10-31)
- SNET current price: $0.0010936
 
- MANA current price: $0.2263
 
- 24-hour trading volume: SNET $9,802.89 vs MANA $136,614.48
 
- Market Sentiment Index (Fear & Greed Index): 29 (Fear)
 
Click to view real-time prices:

II. Core Factors Affecting SNET vs MANA Investment Value
Supply Mechanisms Comparison (Tokenomics)
- SNET: Limited information available on supply mechanism
 
- MANA: Limited information available on supply mechanism
 
- 📌 Historical Pattern: Insufficient data on how supply mechanisms drive price cycle changes.
 
Institutional Adoption and Market Applications
- Institutional Holdings: Insufficient data on institutional preference
 
- Enterprise Adoption: Limited information on applications in cross-border payments, settlements, or portfolio investments
 
- National Policies: No specific information available on regulatory attitudes in different countries
 
Technical Development and Ecosystem Building
- SNET Technical Upgrades: Appears to be focused on network services sector with technical advantages
 
- MANA Technical Development: Product technology appears to be a key factor in its market expansion
 
- Ecosystem Comparison: Insufficient specific information on DeFi, NFT, payment, or smart contract implementations
 
Macroeconomic Environment and Market Cycles
- Performance in Inflationary Environments: Insufficient data on anti-inflation properties
 
- Macroeconomic Monetary Policy: No specific information on how interest rates or the dollar index affect either token
 
- Geopolitical Factors: No information available on cross-border transaction demands or international situations
 
III. 2025-2030 Price Prediction: SNET vs MANA
Short-term Prediction (2025)
- SNET: Conservative $0.000970278 - $0.0010902 | Optimistic $0.0010902 - $0.001624398
 
- MANA: Conservative $0.192525 - $0.2265 | Optimistic $0.2265 - $0.255945
 
Mid-term Prediction (2027)
- SNET may enter a growth phase, with prices expected to range from $0.00084715817085 to $0.00159027937335
 
- MANA may enter a consolidation phase, with prices expected to range from $0.14002966125 to $0.31636330875
 
- Key drivers: Institutional fund inflows, ETF, ecosystem development
 
Long-term Prediction (2030)
- SNET: Base scenario $0.001187506641225 - $0.002047425243492 | Optimistic scenario $0.002047425243492 - $0.002477384544625
 
- MANA: Base scenario $0.26312606456598 - $0.341722161774 | Optimistic scenario $0.341722161774 - $0.46815936163038
 
View detailed price predictions for SNET and MANA
Disclaimer: These predictions are based on historical data and current market trends. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and subject to rapid changes. This information should not be considered as financial advice. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.
SNET:
| 年份 | 
预测最高价 | 
预测平均价格 | 
预测最低价 | 
涨跌幅 | 
| 2025 | 
0.001624398 | 
0.0010902 | 
0.000970278 | 
0 | 
| 2026 | 
0.00161518581 | 
0.001357299 | 
0.00084152538 | 
24 | 
| 2027 | 
0.00159027937335 | 
0.001486242405 | 
0.00084715817085 | 
35 | 
| 2028 | 
0.002184330462628 | 
0.001538260889175 | 
0.000922956533505 | 
40 | 
| 2029 | 
0.002233554811082 | 
0.001861295675901 | 
0.001414584713685 | 
70 | 
| 2030 | 
0.002477384544625 | 
0.002047425243492 | 
0.001187506641225 | 
87 | 
MANA:
| 年份 | 
预测最高价 | 
预测平均价格 | 
预测最低价 | 
涨跌幅 | 
| 2025 | 
0.255945 | 
0.2265 | 
0.192525 | 
0 | 
| 2026 | 
0.277405875 | 
0.2412225 | 
0.233985825 | 
6 | 
| 2027 | 
0.31636330875 | 
0.2593141875 | 
0.14002966125 | 
14 | 
| 2028 | 
0.3223793979 | 
0.287838748125 | 
0.149676149025 | 
27 | 
| 2029 | 
0.3783352505355 | 
0.3051090730125 | 
0.26239380279075 | 
34 | 
| 2030 | 
0.46815936163038 | 
0.341722161774 | 
0.26312606456598 | 
51 | 
IV. Investment Strategy Comparison: SNET vs MANA
Long-term vs Short-term Investment Strategies
- SNET: Suitable for investors focusing on network services sector and technical potential
 
- MANA: Suitable for investors interested in virtual world platforms and metaverse potential
 
Risk Management and Asset Allocation
- Conservative investors: SNET: 30% vs MANA: 70%
 
- Aggressive investors: SNET: 60% vs MANA: 40%
 
- Hedging tools: Stablecoin allocation, options, cross-currency portfolios
 
V. Potential Risk Comparison
Market Risk
- SNET: Lower trading volume may lead to higher volatility
 
- MANA: Susceptible to metaverse hype cycles and market sentiment
 
Technical Risk
- SNET: Scalability, network stability
 
- MANA: Platform adoption, ecosystem development
 
Regulatory Risk
- Global regulatory policies may have different impacts on both tokens
 
VI. Conclusion: Which Is the Better Buy?
📌 Investment Value Summary:
- SNET advantages: Focus on network services, potential for growth in the cloud computing sector
 
- MANA advantages: Established metaverse platform, higher trading volume and liquidity
 
✅ Investment Advice:
- New investors: Consider a balanced approach, leaning towards MANA for its higher liquidity
 
- Experienced investors: Explore potential growth opportunities in SNET while maintaining exposure to MANA
 
- Institutional investors: Conduct thorough due diligence on both projects, considering MANA for its market presence and SNET for potential long-term growth
 
⚠️ Risk Warning: The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile. This article does not constitute investment advice.
None
VII. FAQ
Q1: What are the current prices of SNET and MANA?
A: As of 2025-10-31, SNET's current price is $0.0010936, while MANA's current price is $0.2263.
Q2: Which cryptocurrency has a higher trading volume?
A: MANA has a significantly higher 24-hour trading volume of $136,614.48 compared to SNET's $9,802.89.
Q3: What are the short-term price predictions for SNET and MANA in 2025?
A: For SNET, the conservative prediction ranges from $0.000970278 to $0.0010902, while the optimistic prediction ranges from $0.0010902 to $0.001624398. For MANA, the conservative prediction ranges from $0.192525 to $0.2265, while the optimistic prediction ranges from $0.2265 to $0.255945.
Q4: How do the long-term predictions for 2030 compare between SNET and MANA?
A: For SNET, the base scenario predicts a range of $0.001187506641225 to $0.002047425243492, with an optimistic scenario of $0.002047425243492 to $0.002477384544625. For MANA, the base scenario predicts a range of $0.26312606456598 to $0.341722161774, with an optimistic scenario of $0.341722161774 to $0.46815936163038.
Q5: What are the main differences in investment focus between SNET and MANA?
A: SNET is more suitable for investors focusing on the network services sector and technical potential, while MANA is suitable for investors interested in virtual world platforms and metaverse potential.
Q6: How should conservative and aggressive investors allocate their assets between SNET and MANA?
A: Conservative investors might consider allocating 30% to SNET and 70% to MANA, while aggressive investors might allocate 60% to SNET and 40% to MANA.
Q7: What are the main risk factors for SNET and MANA?
A: SNET faces risks due to lower trading volume leading to higher volatility, as well as potential scalability and network stability issues. MANA is susceptible to metaverse hype cycles and market sentiment, along with risks related to platform adoption and ecosystem development. Both tokens may be impacted by global regulatory policies.