“Several Former Binance Employees + Minority Stake”: What’s the Real Relationship Between CZ and Aster?

9/28/2025, 9:30:17 AM
CZ recently publicly pointed out that the Aster team does indeed have a few former Binance employees involved, but emphasized that Binance did not intervene. Meanwhile, YZi Labs has been confirmed to hold a minority stake in Aster. This article organizes the core facts and market perspectives.

Trigger of the Hot Topic: Aster’s Explosion in Popularity and Controversy

Aster, as an emerging decentralized perpetual contract trading platform, has attracted market attention in a short period of time. The price of its token ASTER has soared dramatically, and trading volume is high, leading the public and media to associate it with Binance / CZ.

Speculation about whether there are hidden powers or supporters behind it has therefore continued to ferment.

CZ’s response: Explanation of team composition and stance

In response to speculation, CZ addressed the public, mainly including:

  • Confirming “a few former Binance employees” participation: CZ stated that the Aster team does have a few former Binance employees, but did not disclose the specific number and roles.
  • Denying official support or control: He emphasized that he does not hold personal investments in the Aster project and has not involved Binance directly.
  • Interpretation of the advisor role: Some media have mentioned that CZ appears as an advisor, a role that typically implies providing advice or resources rather than direct operational control.

The identity and investment relationship of YZi Labs

Another discussion point is the capital connection between YZi Labs and Aster:

  • YZi Labs holds a minority stake in Aster and is one of the early investors.
  • This does not mean that it has absolute say over the project.
  • From past investment data, YZi Labs has had a significant influence on some projects, but there is no public evidence showing deep involvement in Aster.

Therefore, YZi Labs is more like a support backed by capital rather than an actual operator.

Focus of Public Opinion: Interpretation and Controversy

There is a clear divergence in the interpretation of the market and the community:

  • Optimists believe that the background of well-known individuals and the entry of VC means that the project’s potential is enormous.
  • Cautionary Note: It points out that “minority stake + former employees” can be easily exaggerated, reminding not to confuse investment with control.
  • Skeptics: Concerned about the existence of hidden interests and questioning the lack of transparency.
  • Neutral party: Advocates for data and evidence-based conclusions, refraining from excessive inferences for the time being.

Suggestions for Observations for Beginners

For beginners who are new to this event, it is recommended:

  • Pay more attention to on-chain data: trading volume and token distribution are more valuable references than just the “background.”
  • Distinguishing between investment and control: minority equity does not equal actual operation.
  • Beware of the amplification effect of public opinion: popularity can easily be exaggerated by the market.
  • Reasonable position: Avoid heavy buying due to hot sentiment.
* The information is not intended to be and does not constitute financial advice or any other recommendation of any sort offered or endorsed by Gate.
Start Now
Sign up and get a
$100
Voucher!