In 2025, Nikola Corporation officially filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection due to long-term losses, financing difficulties, and delays in product mass production. The core objective of the restructuring plan is to - sell off certain assets, reduce debt burdens, and seek potential acquirers or partners. Despite the company being in financial crisis, it has retained some research and development capabilities and still plans to seek new investments in hydrogen fuel heavy-duty trucks and electric truck platforms.
According to the company’s statement, some debts have been restructured, and some assets (such as production lines, patents, and technological reserves) still have market value. If the restructuring is successful, Nikola still has a chance to re-enter the market in a “small-scale revival” format.
New energy heavy-duty trucks are one of the key development directions for future commercial transportation. Traditional diesel trucks are facing elimination under global carbon reduction pressures, while electric trucks and hydrogen fuel trucks are seen as alternative solutions. Hydrogen energy trucks have advantages of longer range and faster refueling, but the cost of building hydrogen energy infrastructure is high, and the technology is still in its early stages.
In the United States and Europe, governments are gradually launching “green transportation” subsidy policies to encourage transportation companies to adopt zero-emission vehicles. However, the real issue is:
Therefore, although the direction is correct, the entire industry still needs time to accumulate.
Nikola’s bankruptcy has given competitors the opportunity to expand their market share. Tesla (Tesla Semi) has already achieved small-scale deliveries; Rivian, Volvo, Daimler Truck, and others are also launching electric freight vehicles. Meanwhile, competitors on the hydrogen route, such as Hyundai and Toyota, are gradually testing new hydrogen fuel trucks.
In contrast, Nikola was once a “pioneer,” but its lack of execution led to a loss of its advantage. Today, whether it can reintegrate into the industrial ecosystem depends on finding strategic partners—especially in the areas of energy, supply chain, and complete vehicle manufacturing.
When a company’s stock price plummets to the limit (e.g., Nikola falling to about $0.01), the market often exhibits what is known as the “distressed rebound” logic: investors believe that the bad news is all out, the downside potential of the stock price is limited, and once there is news of a successful restructuring or asset acquisition, it could trigger a short-term surge. However, the rebound often proves difficult to sustain because the core issues—profitability, debt, and business model—remain unresolved.
Therefore, for Nikola stock, unless there is a significant breakthrough in restructuring news, short-term fluctuations are more likely to be driven by speculation rather than a reversal in fundamentals.
For beginners, Nikola is a highly educational case:
In addition, investors can understand the technological direction and capital flow of the entire industry by paying attention to peer companies (such as Tesla, Volvo, Hyundai, etc.), thereby indirectly capturing investment opportunities in new energy heavy trucks.
The collapse of Nikola reminds the market that both innovation and execution are equally important. The future of the new energy heavy truck industry remains bright, but short-term risks are significant. Whether it is the electric or hydrogen route, infrastructure, capital investment, and supply chain collaboration will determine who ultimately prevails.
For Nikola, the bankruptcy restructuring could be merely the “beginning of a rebirth” or it could be the “echo of the final chapter.” For investors, the significance of Nikola stock is not just in the rise and fall of a stock, but in how to discern companies that truly possess competitiveness, execution capability, and market adaptability amidst the wave of new technologies.
Share
Content