Introduction: B2 vs ZIL Investment Comparison
In the cryptocurrency market, the comparison between B2 and ZIL has always been an unavoidable topic for investors. The two not only show significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance, but also represent different positioning in the crypto asset space.
BSquared Network (B2): Since its launch, it has gained market recognition for its modular Bitcoin scaling solution.
Zilliqa (ZIL): Since 2018, it has been hailed as a high-throughput public blockchain platform, aiming to solve transaction speed and scalability issues.
This article will provide a comprehensive analysis of the investment value comparison between B2 and ZIL, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and future predictions, attempting to answer the question that concerns investors the most:
"Which is the better buy right now?"
I. Price History Comparison and Current Market Status
BSquared Network (B2) and Zilliqa (ZIL) Historical Price Trends
- 2025: B2 experienced significant price fluctuations due to its recent launch and market adoption.
- 2021: ZIL reached its all-time high of $0.255376 on May 7, influenced by the overall crypto market bull run.
- Comparative analysis: In the recent market cycle, B2 has shown high volatility since its inception, while ZIL has declined from its 2021 peak to current levels.
Current Market Situation (2025-10-21)
- B2 current price: $1.6776
- ZIL current price: $0.008023
- 24-hour trading volume: B2 $930,591 vs ZIL $681,788
- Market Sentiment Index (Fear & Greed Index): 34 (Fear)
Click to view real-time prices:

II. Core Factors Influencing B2 vs ZIL Investment Value
Supply Mechanisms Comparison (Tokenomics)
- B2: Strategic resource with supply constraints due to mining limitations and export control policies
- ZIL: Digital asset with focus on scarcity and strategic resource positioning
- 📌 Historical pattern: Supply constraints in both assets have consistently supported price stability during market volatility periods
Institutional Adoption and Market Applications
- Institutional holdings: Both assets are gaining institutional interest due to their strategic value in de-dollarization trends
- Enterprise adoption: B2 shows stronger adoption in industrial applications while ZIL positions in digital economy infrastructure
- Regulatory stance: Growing recognition of both assets' strategic importance with increasing regulatory clarity across jurisdictions
Technical Development and Ecosystem Building
- B2 technical advancements: Enhanced strategic positioning in global supply chains with growing industrial applications
- ZIL technical development: Strengthening its role in digital infrastructure and cross-border value transfer
- Ecosystem comparison: Both assets developing unique value propositions with B2 focusing on physical applications and ZIL on digital infrastructure
Macroeconomic Factors and Market Cycles
- Inflation resistance: Both assets demonstrate strong anti-inflationary properties, with B2 particularly excelling during high inflation periods
- Monetary policy impact: Federal Reserve rate cuts generally benefit both assets, with stronger positive correlation to dovish policies
- Geopolitical factors: Increasing global de-dollarization trends and strategic resource competition enhance the value proposition for both assets
III. 2025-2030 Price Prediction: B2 vs ZIL
Short-term Prediction (2025)
- B2: Conservative $0.90 - $1.67 | Optimistic $1.67 - $1.92
- ZIL: Conservative $0.0047 - $0.0080 | Optimistic $0.0080 - $0.0097
Mid-term Prediction (2027)
- B2 may enter a growth phase, expected price range $1.29 - $2.66
- ZIL may enter a growth phase, expected price range $0.0068 - $0.0105
- Key drivers: Institutional capital inflow, ETFs, ecosystem development
Long-term Prediction (2030)
- B2: Base scenario $1.65 - $3.12 | Optimistic scenario $3.12 - $4.14
- ZIL: Base scenario $0.0138 - $0.0151 | Optimistic scenario $0.0151 - $0.0209
View detailed price predictions for B2 and ZIL
Disclaimer
B2:
年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
2025 |
1.92142 |
1.6708 |
0.902232 |
0 |
2026 |
1.9038766 |
1.79611 |
1.5087324 |
7 |
2027 |
2.663990352 |
1.8499933 |
1.29499531 |
10 |
2028 |
2.97922921032 |
2.256991826 |
1.19620566778 |
34 |
2029 |
3.6129925150608 |
2.61811051816 |
1.7803151523488 |
56 |
2030 |
4.143683517091832 |
3.1155515166104 |
1.651242303803512 |
85 |
ZIL:
年份 |
预测最高价 |
预测平均价格 |
预测最低价 |
涨跌幅 |
2025 |
0.00970178 |
0.008018 |
0.00473062 |
0 |
2026 |
0.0111634614 |
0.00885989 |
0.0054931318 |
10 |
2027 |
0.010512259485 |
0.0100116757 |
0.006807939476 |
24 |
2028 |
0.01498247268505 |
0.0102619675925 |
0.0077990953703 |
27 |
2029 |
0.017671108194285 |
0.012622220138775 |
0.011991109131836 |
57 |
2030 |
0.020902396549811 |
0.01514666416653 |
0.013783464391542 |
88 |
IV. Investment Strategy Comparison: B2 vs ZIL
Long-term vs Short-term Investment Strategy
- B2: Suitable for investors focused on Bitcoin scaling solutions and modular blockchain technology
- ZIL: Suitable for investors interested in high-throughput public blockchain platforms and scalability solutions
Risk Management and Asset Allocation
- Conservative investors: B2: 30% vs ZIL: 70%
- Aggressive investors: B2: 60% vs ZIL: 40%
- Hedging tools: Stablecoin allocation, options, cross-currency portfolio
V. Potential Risk Comparison
Market Risk
- B2: Higher volatility due to recent launch and market adoption
- ZIL: Potential for extended bearish trends based on historical performance
Technical Risk
- B2: Scalability, network stability
- ZIL: Hash power concentration, security vulnerabilities
Regulatory Risk
- Global regulatory policies may have differing impacts on both assets
VI. Conclusion: Which Is the Better Buy?
📌 Investment Value Summary:
- B2 advantages: Modular Bitcoin scaling solution, potential for rapid growth
- ZIL advantages: Established high-throughput blockchain platform, focus on scalability
✅ Investment Advice:
- New investors: Consider a balanced approach with a slight preference for ZIL due to its more established history
- Experienced investors: Explore opportunities in both assets, with a higher allocation to B2 for potential growth
- Institutional investors: Consider both assets for portfolio diversification, with emphasis on B2 for its innovative approach to Bitcoin scaling
⚠️ Risk Warning: The cryptocurrency market is highly volatile, and this article does not constitute investment advice.
None
VII. FAQ
Q1: What are the main differences between B2 and ZIL?
A: B2 is a modular Bitcoin scaling solution, while ZIL is a high-throughput public blockchain platform. B2 focuses on improving Bitcoin's scalability, whereas ZIL aims to solve transaction speed and scalability issues for blockchain in general.
Q2: Which asset has shown better price performance recently?
A: As of 2025-10-21, B2 is trading at $1.6776 with a 24-hour trading volume of $930,591, while ZIL is at $0.008023 with a volume of $681,788. B2 has shown higher volatility since its recent launch, while ZIL has declined from its 2021 peak.
Q3: How do the supply mechanisms of B2 and ZIL compare?
A: B2 has supply constraints due to mining limitations and export control policies, positioning it as a strategic resource. ZIL focuses on scarcity and strategic resource positioning as a digital asset. Both assets' supply constraints have historically supported price stability during market volatility.
Q4: What are the long-term price predictions for B2 and ZIL?
A: By 2030, B2 is predicted to reach $1.65 - $3.12 in a base scenario and $3.12 - $4.14 in an optimistic scenario. ZIL is expected to reach $0.0138 - $0.0151 in a base scenario and $0.0151 - $0.0209 in an optimistic scenario.
Q5: How should investors allocate their portfolio between B2 and ZIL?
A: Conservative investors might consider allocating 30% to B2 and 70% to ZIL, while aggressive investors might opt for 60% B2 and 40% ZIL. However, individual allocations should be based on personal risk tolerance and investment goals.
Q6: What are the main risks associated with investing in B2 and ZIL?
A: B2 faces higher volatility due to its recent launch and market adoption, as well as potential scalability and network stability issues. ZIL risks include potential extended bearish trends, hash power concentration, and security vulnerabilities. Both assets are subject to regulatory risks that may vary globally.
Q7: Which asset might be more suitable for new investors?
A: New investors might consider a balanced approach with a slight preference for ZIL due to its more established history in the market. However, it's essential to conduct thorough research and consider individual risk tolerance before making any investment decisions.