LIBRA Token: The Meme Coin Endorsed by the President of Argentina
Introduction
The rise and fall of the LIBRA Token reveal the significant impact of political endorsements on the cryptocurrency market. From the support of the President of Argentina to the $4 billion meme coin, bribery controversies, and insider trading allegations, LIBRA’s story illustrates the madness and risks of the cryptocurrency world. This article delves into the truth behind the heart-stopping market value fluctuations.
Political Endorsement Ignites LIBRA: The New Darling of the Memetic Coin Market
On February 14, 2025, the official X account of Argentine President Javier Milei suddenly announced the launch of a meme coin named LIBRA, which instantly ignited the cryptocurrency market. Thanks to the high-profile endorsement of the president, LIBRA quickly attracted the attention of a large number of investors, and its market value soared to an astonishing $4 billion in just a few hours. This phenomenon fully demonstrates the significant influence of political figures in the cryptocurrency field, as well as the fervent pursuit of meme coins market for endorsements from high-profile individuals.
According to the issuance details of the LIBRA Token, the total supply is 1 billion, and it will be released on February 15, 2025. In the early stage of its launch, LIBRA quickly attracted over 31,000 holding addresses, reflecting the market’s strong interest in this politically endorsed cryptocurrency.
Controversy, the truth of volatility: The mystery of the $4 billion evaporation of LIBRA
However, the glory of the LIBRA Token did not last long. After reaching a peak market value of $4 billion, LIBRA experienced a stunning crash, with its market value evaporating by more than 90% in a short period of time. This dramatic turn of events triggered widespread questioning and investigation in the market.
According to blockchain data analysis, the collapse of LIBRA token seems to stem from some large holders starting massive sell-offs just three hours after the token was issued, sparking strong suspicions of insider trading.
Specifically, a wallet named 0xcEA transferred 1.6 million USDC to three Solana wallets a few hours before the issuance of the LIBRA token, which is believed to be related to the token issuance. Subsequently, these wallets immediately conducted large-scale sell-offs after the launch of the LIBRA token, leading to a sharp drop in price. It was reported that insiders cashed out about 87 million USD within a few hours, directly causing the collapse of the value of the LIBRA token.
The collapse of the LIBRA token not only raised questions about the project itself, but also led to a series of shocking political scandals. According to CoinDesk, Hayden Davis, co-founder of the LIBRA token, claimed in a text message that he influenced the president’s decision by bribing Karina Millet, the sister of Argentine President Javier Millet. This revelation has sparked widespread attention and controversy, although there is currently no solid evidence to confirm the truth of this claim.
This series of events has not only exposed the potential problem of large holders selling off LIBRA tokens, but also highlighted the potential volatility risks of politically endorsed cryptocurrency projects.
Outlook: The Dual Melody of Rebound and Selling in the Future
Despite the controversy surrounding the issuance of LIBRA tokens, it still demonstrates the unique market resilience of meme coins. After the initial sharp decline, LIBRA tokens have rebounded slightly several times. Many investors believe that after experiencing sufficient selling, market sentiment may gradually stabilize, creating conditions for potential rebounds.
For example, in the last bear market, tokens such as LUNA and FTT experienced a significant drop, but then experienced a surge due to favorable events such as project compensation. Of course, from a regulatory perspective, the LIBRA incident highlights the necessity of strengthening regulation of the cryptocurrency market. Especially when it comes to political figures, it is necessary to establish stricter information disclosure mechanisms and conflict of interest review procedures. This not only helps protect the interests of investors, but also maintains the long-term healthy development of the cryptocurrency market.
Faced with these risks, investors need to adopt a more cautious and rational investment strategy. When participating in any cryptocurrency project, especially those related to political figures, in-depth research and analysis should be conducted, and not be misled by short-term popularity and superficial endorsements. At the same time, establishing a diversified investment portfolio and rational allocation of funds is also an effective way to reduce risks.
Conclusion
The fate of the LIBRA Token trajectory reminds us: Political endorsement can bring temporary prosperity, but there are high volatility and insider trading risks. Investors should remain rational, study the essence of the project in depth, rather than blindly following celebrity effects. This incident also calls for trading platforms to strengthen supervision, increase transparency, and build a safer investment environment for users.
Risk warning: Policy changes or stricter regulations may lead to political endorsement token projects similar to LIBRA facing stricter scrutiny, affecting their market performance.
👉🏻 Trade LIBRA now:
https://www.gate.io/en/pilot/solana/libra-libra
