I just read that the legal team of a major platform is questioning how the states are handling prediction markets. Basically, they say there's regulatory gaslighting involved, which sounds strong coming from someone involved in sector litigation. The thing is, these prediction-related lawsuits have been complicated for a while. Regulators are going one way, platforms another, and no one agrees on what exactly should be allowed. What's interesting is that from the legal side, they are documenting all of this as part of their strategic litigation. It seems the argument is that the states are being inconsistent with what they say is permitted versus what they actually allow. I don't know about you, but these lawsuits will be key to defining how this works in the future. Do you think they are right, or is it just the industry side defending its interests?