Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
I noticed that Vitalik Buterin's message about the Layer-2 ecosystem has become a hot topic in the industry. The core of his criticism is simple but profound — many L2 projects are just following a repeated pattern, and this is becoming a problem not only for technology but for the entire direction of Ethereum expansion.
Buterin said that building "another EVM chain with an optimistic bridge and weekly delay" has become just a standard formula. The problem here is not only technical — it’s a mindset pattern where convenience has become more important than innovation. No real change, no new ideas, just copy-pasting existing designs.
The most interesting part of his point is his distinction between chains that are truly connected to Ethereum versus projects that only market themselves as "Ethereum-connected" while operating independently. Having a bridge doesn’t automatically mean it’s part of the core infrastructure. Substance must match the marketing vibes.
But he didn’t just criticize without basis. He endorsed two models that he sees as still having potential. First, app-specific systems that rely on Ethereum for critical functions like payments and verification. Second, institutional chains that post cryptographic proofs back to Ethereum. These are not Ethereum itself but have similar transparency and verifiability.
The timing of his message is strategic. As Ethereum’s base layer throughput increases and fees decrease, the old argument that "L2 for cheaper transactions" is becoming less relevant. This has triggered reactions across the ecosystem — Steven Goldfeder of Arbitrum countered that their network should be viewed as a close ally, not as Ethereum itself, while Jesse Pollak of Base insisted they should still offer beyond just cheap fees.
This debate is actually pushing the ecosystem toward clarity. L2 projects need to define their unique value proposition beyond just being cheaper. This is the pattern that needs to change — from pure cost arbitrage to genuine innovation and specialization. The industry seems to be starting to mature in this direction.