Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Pre-IPOs
Unlock full access to global stock IPOs
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
I just saw that that stablecoin linked to Trump is having serious problems. Apparently WLFI says it is being attacked in a coordinated way, but honestly I don't know if that's an excuse or if there is really something shady behind it.
The issue is that these stablecoin projects always generate a lot of controversy. One would think that something backed by a political figure would have more stability, but it seems that's not the case. The price is wobbling, and those who entered early must be worried.
The strange thing is that WLFI blames a coordinated attack. Could it be true or is it just an attempt to explain why the stablecoin isn't maintaining its value? Because if a stablecoin can't keep its parity, that's a fundamental problem, not just a security issue.
Is anyone else following this or is it just me who finds this somewhat suspicious?