$BTC Actually, when it comes to data, it's almost impossible to buy at the lowest point or sell at the highest point. No matter how sophisticated the data is, it's difficult to achieve. But analyzing data is to better understand the chip structure, capital flows, investor sentiment, and market consensus.

However, these data points may all be less useful than Trump saying he will increase tariffs by 200%, or announcing who he plans to attack tomorrow, because no data can predict the actions of those in power. The rules of how this world operates are often controlled by those in power. Or it can be said that those in power are the biggest "market manipulators."

I remember there was a prediction market betting on how many tweets Trump would send in a day. That might be difficult for others, but for Trump, he can always win—it's just a matter of whether he's willing to participate.

So even analyzing thousands of data points about Trump is almost impossible to match his own decisions. Data is like that: when the overall trend isn't changing much, data effectively reflects the trend. But when an emergency disrupts the original trend, it becomes useless.

What we can see now from the data is very clear: most investors are very interested in $BTC below $70,000 and have been buying. That’s a fact. But if tomorrow there’s a third world war, the entire trend could be shattered. High-net-worth investors still buying might immediately turn into sellers.

Therefore, data is more of an aid in trading decisions, but the main driver is still yourself. If you knew tomorrow was the last day on Earth, buying anything would be pointless. But if you believe that this geopolitical conflict won't have a big impact and things will eventually return to normal, you might also think that BTC below $70,000 is quite cheap.

I believe even high-net-worth investors tend to buy Bitcoin gradually rather than going all-in at once.