Author: Max Wong @IOSG

Original link:

Disclaimer: This article is republished content. Readers can get more information through the original link. If the author has any objections to the republishing format, please contact us, and we will make revisions according to the author’s requests. Republished content is only for information sharing and doeses not constitute any investment advice. It does not represent Wu Shuo’s views or stance.

Overview

Pump.fun launched in early 2024 as a permissionless Meme Launchpad on Solana, allowing anyone to create and trade tokens in a matter of seconds through a Bonding Curve mechanism. The project started as a niche experiment, but it quickly became one of the highest-revenue applications on public blockchains.

Between 2024 and 2025, Pump.fun’s average daily protocol revenue stayed roughly level with Hyperliquid and even surpassed it at times. Since the Meme market it operates in is naturally highly cyclical, this figure is even more noteworthy. The native token $PUMP was issued via a $600 million ICO at $0.004, with an FDV of $4 billion.

Over the past few months, revenue hit record highs and the token’s value doubled, but $PUMP’s current price is around $0.0019—down about 80% from its historical high of $0.086 (corresponding to an FDV of $8.6 billion). Current market cap is about $679 million, with an FDV of $1.9 billion. The gap between the revenue trend and the valuation is very clear.

This report lays out Pump.fun’s product evolution and ecosystem strategy, stress-tests whether its revenue is “inflated,” and assesses whether the current valuation is a pricing discrepancy or a reasonable discount against real risks.

I. Product Portfolio

Pump.fun is no longer just a Launchpad. Starting in late 2024, it began expanding into adjacent businesses—broadening revenue streams and deepening its control over on-chain speculative traffic.

Launchpad (core product)

The earliest product and the starting point for brand recognition. Anyone can deploy a token by paying a small fee.

PumpSwap

PumpSwap is Pump.fun’s own AMM DEX, launched in March 2025. The purpose is straightforward: take back the graduation fees that previously flowed to Raydium (Raydium charges 6 SOL for each graduated token). After the fee rate update in May 2025, the protocol takes 0.05% from each trade, with 0.20% allocated to LPs and 0.05% to the token issuer.

Features include: freely creating liquidity pools for any token, adding liquidity to existing pools, and trading tokens listed on PumpSwap.

Padre / Pump Terminal

After Pump.fun acquired Padre, it was renamed Terminal. It is positioned as a professional trading terminal, currently supporting Solana, BNB, Base, and ETH.

Its functions are similar to comparable terminals: Trenches (view new migrated / soon-to-be migrated tokens), custom interfaces, sniping and instant buys, multi-wallet strategies, and a bundled detector.

Pumplive

Pumplive is the platform’s live-streaming feature. When a streamer creates a live stream, they can associate a token with it.

The logic is “publishers are the exchanges,” similar to the model of Parti and Kick/stake.com. Streamers want to drive trading volume because they earn a cut from total fees; token holders want more trading volume and more buy pressure. The more a streamer streams, the more active the token becomes and the higher the trading volume.

II. Ecosystem Initiatives

Since TGE, Pump.fun has held roughly $1 billion in cash reserves, and has continued launching new product lines (acquiring Padre is one example). At the same time, it is doing several things:

Pumpfund

A $3 million BiP (Build in Public) hackathon launched on January 19, 2026. Using a $10 million valuation as the benchmark, it provides $250k in funding to each of 12 projects. The selection criteria lean toward market-based curation driven by public attention, rather than following the traditional VC review route.

Glass Full Foundation

GFF is a liquidity injection program launched in August 2025. Using 5 transparent wallets, it deployed about $1.7 million (2,022 SOL) across 10 tokens (including Tokabu 21.3%, House 20.6%, USDUC, NEET, MASK, FART, etc.). The selection tends to favor projects with high community participation.

Project Ascend

A creator incentive program launched in 2025. The core is a dynamic tiered creator fee (from 0.95% down to 0.05%). The goal is to increase creator earnings by 10x while also accelerating the CTO (community takeover) application process.

III. Composite Metrics (All Products)

The table below summarizes three product lines. 2025 represents actual data, and 2026 represents expected operating rates.

Currently, about 32.7% of total revenue comes from non-Launchpad products, and revenue diversification has begun to show results.

Currently, about 32.7% of the platform’s total revenue comes from non-Launchpad products, which clearly shows that it has achieved initial success toward diversifying its revenue sources and pursuing growth in other areas.

▲ Pumpfun trading volume chart

▲ Pumpswap trading volume chart

▲ Padre / Pump Terminal trading volume chart

IV. Does Pump.fun Have Volume “Wash Trading”?

The surface fundamentals of $PUMP look strong, but the core question is: does trading volume reflect real economic activity, or is it being manufactured by users and bots?

Trading Volume Correlation Analysis

The logic is simple: in a natural market, trading volume on Launchpad and PumpSwap should be positively correlated, with a time lag. Higher Launchpad activity implies stronger real speculative interest, and some capital flows into PumpSwap through the graduation mechanism, supporting post-listing trading.

If there is significant wash trading, this relationship will break. Launchpad trading volume is artificially inflated; tokens graduate based on a forged curve activity, and when they enter PumpSwap there are no real buyers. The result: Launchpad volume spikes massively, while PumpSwap volume stays flat or even declines, driving correlation toward zero or even negative.

The strongest signal combination for the problem is: a surge in the graduation rate (more tokens artificially reaching the curve thresholds), while per-token trading volume on PumpSwap stays low and quickly decays—and PumpSwap’s liquidity depth does not increase in step with the number of graduated tokens.

Data from January 2026 to the present:

(The first two data points are abnormal due to PumpSwap fee and market-maker policy changes, so they are not included in the correlation analysis.)

Findings:

Launchpad trading volume is very stable, fluctuating between $400 million and $570 million over 8 weeks (about a 40% range). Given that lots of bundle traders and wash-volume users help maintain the trading volume floor, this is not surprising.

PumpSwap has larger volatility, ranging from $3.5 billion to $5.8 billion in the same period (about a 60% range), mainly driven by a spike in Meme trading demand in mid-January and additional team incentive measures. Meanwhile, Launchpad did not show a corresponding increase in volume.

r = 0.579, a moderate positive correlation. With a sample size n = 8, achieving p < 0.05 would require r > 0.63, which does not meet the significance threshold. However, the direction and strength are consistent with the organic growth hypothesis.

University of Pizza Paper

Researchers at the University of Pizza conducted a comprehensive on-chain analysis of the Pump.fun Launchpad. They covered all trades of 655,770 tokens issued between September and October 2025, and distinguished bots from human trades through Solana transaction log metadata.

Four of the findings directly relate to the issue of fake trades.

Large human buys are the strongest predictor of graduation

The strongest predictive signal for graduation is the rapid accumulation of SOL via a small number of large transactions. The median number of successful graduations needs only about 457 transactions—from token creation to graduation in roughly 4.4 minutes. This pattern (large, low-frequency capital inflows from different wallets) is consistent with coordinated artificial speculation (Telegram group calls, KOL pumping), or staged take-profit selling—not with high-frequency wash-trading bots manufacturing volume. Instead, bot-dominated tokens accumulate many small trades and then stall before graduation.

Bot activity actually suppresses graduation

After the early curve stage, tokens with more active bot participation have systematically lower probabilities of graduating. At the time, the graduation requirement was to accumulate about 85 SOL on the curve. If bots were pumping volume to drive graduation, the graduation rate of tokens with active bot participation should be higher—but the data is the opposite.

The reason is structural: at graduation, the Bonding Curve transitions from virtual reserves to real AMM reserves, and the effective liquidity depth becomes less discrete. With the depth supported by virtual reserves before graduation, selling before graduation is more profitable than selling after graduation.

The research also found that among the top ten token issuers by ranking in September 2025, each issued more than 2,000 tokens within a single month. For each token, before it reached the graduation threshold, statistical abnormal selling sequences initiated by wallet clusters could be observed. Bundle traders and snipers pre-positioned themselves and then dumped when retail demand attracted by the curve’s rise appeared.

Paper conclusion: Most bots on the platform are front-runners. They capture value from human trading counterparts when entering and exiting; they are not wash-trading traders trying to meet graduation thresholds. Bots buy/snipe and hoard large supply, and then sell to retail near graduation. This is different from wash-trading volume.

SOL net flow remains positive, which is structurally incompatible with wash trading

The paper calculated the SOL net flow of the full dataset (total SOL used for the curve minus total SOL extracted via sells). During the one-month observation period, the ecosystem cumulatively net retained about 160k SOL (approximately $32 million based on the price in September 2025).

This is a hard test against wash trading: circular trading volume among linked wallets would drive net capital flow close to zero because buys and sells offset each other. A net retention of $32 million is structurally incompatible with large-scale circular trading volume, indicating that real external retail capital is continuously flowing into Launchpad. Each transaction pays a 1.25% fee, creating a loss that funds protocol revenue.

The paper’s findings are consistent with the conclusions from our trading-volume correlation analysis: most of the high trading volume on Launchpad is generated by bundle traders and snipers pumping and taking profit, which creates a trading volume floor—but it is not wash trading. The distinction is crucial: wash trading produces zero net protocol revenue (fees offset across linked wallets), while pumping and taking profit generates real fees in each trade (from real retail trading counterparts paying for access to the platform). The approximately $390 million ARR confirms that the platform monetizes real retail trading volume from a pumping/take-profit ecosystem rather than manufacturing fake metrics.

V. Token Economics

Buybacks

Currently, the Pump fund allocates 100% of revenue from all product lines to public-market buybacks of $PUMP. Since the announcement of 100% revenue buybacks on July 15, 2025, over 8 months:

It bought back 27% of circulating supply, clearing 9.6% of total supply.

For comparison: Since Hyperliquid launched buybacks in November 2024, it has only burned 4.1% of total supply (about 12.3% of circulating supply).

Based on the current price and revenue, the annualized circulating-supply clearance ratio is close to 45%.

Supply structure and unlocks

Total supply: 1B,000 PUMP

Circulating supply: 430,000,000,000 (43%)

Remaining locked: about 58% of total supply

Key unlock nodes: ongoing: 12% (as of July, 2% per month used for community and incentives) July 2026: unlock 8.25%, then 0.68% per month for 36 months thereafter.

Valuation analysis

If the wash-trading analysis holds, $PUMP is undervalued, with asymmetric upside potential.

The discount comes from three aspects:

Market doubts about revenue sustainability

The market believes Pump.fun’s total platform trading volume is speculative and cyclical, tied to short-term Meme activity. Investors treat current profitability as temporary. At the current price-to-earnings ratio, buybacks have a financial accretion effect, but the valuation model does not incorporate it because the underlying assumption is that revenue will compress significantly. The debate is not whether Pump.fun is profitable today, but whether it will still be profitable 24 months from now.

Lack of institutional coverage

We interviewed 15 tier 1 secondary funds and VCs to understand their views on $PUMP. Of the 15, only 1 was actively tracking $PUMP with a bottom-up analysis. Most institutions do not model the new product suite, do not break down revenue by product line, and have not stress-tested the sustainability of trading volume.

The lack of coverage creates a narrative vacuum, and pricing is driven more by market perception than by financial analysis. In contrast, $HYPE has deeper institutional support, more research coverage, and clearer product positioning, which supports higher and more stable valuation multiples.

There is also a self-reinforcing effect: assets related to Meme infrastructure are implicitly categorized as speculative and temporary, and trading behavior follows. The market needs time and data across multiple cycles to update this perception framework. Until Pump’s revenues withstand broader crypto market drawdowns and institutional coverage expands, valuation compression may persist, regardless of current cash flows.

Management trust has not been established

Investors’ concerns focus on long-term vision outside Meme, capital allocation discipline, execution of the product roadmap, and the transition from viral growth to a sustainable platform economy.

Markets often assign lower valuation multiples to high-growth platforms led by founders until the platform demonstrates resilience amid market volatility—showing that growth can translate into a sustainable platform economy. Until Pump demonstrates ongoing revenue diversification and robust execution through products such as PumpSwap and Pump Terminal, this discount will likely still exist.