AI reveals the truth about 50 years of U.S. industrial policy

robot
Abstract generation in progress

Why has national security become the core driving force of U.S. industrial policy?

Wei Shangjin and his collaborators Ju Jiandong and Li Yuankun’s latest research utilizes large language models to analyze over 18,000 bills and presidential orders in the U.S. from 1973 to 2022, revealing that the U.S. is not the laissez-faire economy that people often believe, but rather an active industrial policy maker for the past half century. On average, more than nine new intervention measures are introduced each year, with policy frequency remaining stable during both parties’ administrations.

Unlike the competitive logic emphasized by economic theory, more than half of U.S. industrial policies prioritize national security and supply chain resilience as primary considerations.

To prevent efficiency losses that might arise from administrative intervention, these policies generally include clear validity periods, pilot projects, or exit mechanisms triggered by specific conditions.

Research through market testing has proven that these policies significantly altered the direction of resource allocation, with the stock prices and revenues of supported companies seeing substantial increases after the policies were implemented.

For the past 50 years, the U.S. government has been continuously and profoundly reshaping the domestic economic landscape through “visible hands” such as public procurement, subsidies, and trade restrictions.

Paper: Ju J D, Li Y K, Wei S J. The United States as an Active Industrial Policy Nation [R]. NBER, 2026.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pin