Identifying Illegal Investment Advisory Traps: Investor Prevention Guide Released

Securities Times Reporter Hu Feijun

Faced with a wide variety of investment advisory marketing in the market, ordinary investors often face a dilemma: on one side are tempting phrases like “guaranteed profit” and “insider information”; on the other are frequent reports of institutions being fined.

How can investors distinguish truth from falsehood in a mixed market and choose truly trustworthy investment advisory services? The Securities Times reporter interviewed several institutional managers and experts, who provided practical advice.

The primary prerequisite for choosing an investment advisory service is to verify whether the other party has a legitimate license.

You Xin (pseudonym), head of a Shanghai-based investment advisory firm, said investors can verify through official regulatory channels whether the service provider is a licensed securities investment consulting institution registered with the China Securities Regulatory Commission, and whether the staff hold the necessary securities investment consulting qualifications. Unlicensed institutions and personnel without professional certificates offering advisory services are illegal.

Hong Shang (pseudonym), head of another Shanghai-based investment advisory firm, also suggested that investors should carefully verify through the China Securities Industry Association’s official channels whether the institution has the proper business qualifications and whether the staff have completed professional registration. The principle to follow is “verify qualifications first, then discern essence, and reject temptation.”

Tian Lihui, Dean of the Nankai University Financial Development Research Institute, further stated that investors should not only check the qualifications of the institution and personnel but also pay attention to penalty records, which are the basic bottom line for assessing an institution’s compliance level.

After verifying qualifications, investors also need to develop a keen eye for identifying speech traps. Phrases like “guaranteed profit,” “super high returns,” and “insider information”—these seemingly attractive promises—are clear signs of “pseudo-advisors.”

You Xin said that any claims promising capital preservation, high returns, guaranteed profits, or insider information are false marketing tactics. Hong Shang advised that investors should maintain zero trust in such promotions and stay far away.

Tian Lihui warned that those who excessively showcase profit screenshots often hide significant risks behind them. Legitimate investment advisory firms provide ongoing support and logical analysis, not “wealth codes.”

After ruling out illegal institutions and false marketing, how can investors select truly high-quality services from compliant institutions? This requires looking beyond marketing appearances to understand the core essence of the service.

You Xin proposed three key dimensions: First, look at the service logic. High-quality advisory firms focus on asset allocation, risk control, and long-term value investing, rather than simply recommending stocks or hyping short-term hot topics. Their service plans should align with the long-term goal of steady family wealth growth. Second, assess risk matching. Professional advisory firms evaluate investors’ risk tolerance and actual needs through standardized processes and provide suitable investment plans, never forcing products or services beyond the investor’s risk level. Third, evaluate professional output. Reliable advisory firms continuously produce substantive content such as market research reports, investment strategy analysis, review sessions, and investor education, supporting investment decisions with professional expertise rather than relying solely on marketing language to attract clients.

Tian Lihui summarized that investors should build a “firewall” from three dimensions: verify institution and personnel qualifications and penalty records as the basic bottom line; scrutinize contract exemption clauses, as any guarantee of capital preservation should raise suspicion; and distinguish service content—legitimate advisory firms provide ongoing support and logical analysis. Only by doing so can investors avoid traps in a complex market and select truly valuable advisory services.

(Edited by He Chong)

【Disclaimer】This article only reflects the author’s personal views and is not related to Hexun.com. Hexun.com remains neutral regarding the statements and opinions in this article and does not provide any explicit or implicit guarantees regarding the accuracy, reliability, or completeness of the content. Readers should use this for reference only and bear all responsibilities themselves. Email: news_center@staff.hexun.com