Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Identifying Illegal Investment Advisory Traps: Investor Prevention Guide Released
Securities Times Reporter Hu Feijun
Faced with a wide variety of investment advisory marketing in the market, ordinary investors often struggle to choose: on one side are tempting phrases like “guaranteed profit” and “insider information”; on the other are frequent reports of institutions being fined.
How can investors distinguish truth from falsehood in this mixed market and select truly trustworthy advisory services? The Securities Times interviewed several institutional managers and experts, who provided practical advice.
The primary prerequisite for choosing an advisory service is to verify whether the provider has a legitimate license.
You Xin (pseudonym), head of a Shanghai-based investment advisory firm, said investors can verify through official regulatory channels whether the institution providing the service is a licensed securities investment consulting firm registered with the China Securities Regulatory Commission, and whether the staff have the necessary securities investment consulting qualifications. Unlicensed institutions and personnel without professional certificates offering advisory services are illegal.
Hong Shang (pseudonym), head of another Shanghai-based advisory firm, also recommended that investors carefully verify through the China Securities Industry Association’s official channels whether the institution has the proper business qualifications and whether the staff have completed professional registration. The principle to follow is “verify qualifications first, then discern the true nature, and reject temptation.”
Tian Lihui, Dean of the Nankai University Financial Development Research Institute, further stated that investors should not only check the qualifications of the institution and personnel but also pay attention to penalty records, which are the basic bottom line for assessing an institution’s compliance level.
After verifying qualifications, investors also need to develop a keen eye for identifying speech traps. Promises like “guaranteed profit,” “super high returns,” and “insider information”—these enticing claims—are clear signs of “pseudo-advisors.”
You Xin said that any claims promising capital preservation, high returns, guaranteed profits, or insider information are false marketing tactics. Hong Shang advised that investors should maintain zero trust towards such promotions and stay far away.
Tian Lihui warned that those who excessively showcase profit screenshots often hide significant risks behind them. Legitimate advisory firms provide ongoing support and logical analysis, not “wealth codes.”
After ruling out illegal institutions and false claims, how can investors select truly high-quality services from compliant firms? This requires looking beyond marketing appearances to see the core value of the service.
You Xin highlighted three key dimensions: First, look at the service logic. Quality advisory firms focus on asset allocation, risk control, and long-term value investing, rather than simply recommending stocks or hyping short-term hot topics. Their service plans should align with the long-term goal of steady family wealth growth; Second, assess risk matching. Professional advisory firms evaluate investors’ risk tolerance and actual needs through standardized processes and offer suitable investment plans, never pushing products or services beyond the investor’s risk level; Third, evaluate professional output. Reliable advisory firms continuously produce substantive content such as market research reports, investment strategy analysis, review sessions, and investor education, supporting investment decisions with professional expertise rather than relying solely on marketing language.
Tian Lihui summarized that investors should build a “firewall” from three dimensions: verify institution and personnel qualifications and penalty records as a basic bottom line; scrutinize contract exemption clauses, especially any capital preservation promises; and distinguish service content—legitimate advisory firms provide ongoing support and logical analysis. Only by doing so can investors avoid traps in a complex market and select truly valuable advisory services.