Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
The fundamental difference between coin-margined and USDT-margined contracts: why low-leverage strategies can outperform most traders
Crypto-asset-based contracts and U-based contracts differ far more than just their pricing units. Understanding the fundamental difference between the two can help you discover hidden arbitrage opportunities in the market. Crypto-asset-based contracts use coins as collateral, with profits and losses calculated in coins; U-based contracts are entirely calculated in U. But this difference in trading mechanisms directly impacts your risk control and profit potential.
The Truth About Crypto-Asset-Based Contracts: Innately Long-Only Attributes
To establish a crypto-asset-based position, you must first buy the coin with U through spot trading. This process inherently has a long bias—your spot holdings will fluctuate with the coin’s price movements. When you open a crypto-asset-based long contract, this one-to-one long characteristic is built in. In other words, in the crypto-asset system, no matter what contract you open, coin price volatility will directly affect your spot gains, which is an unavoidable mechanism feature.
Therefore, a one-to-one short contract in crypto-asset-based trading is theoretically close to zero leverage—it will never trigger liquidation. When the coin price drops, the contract gains more coins, but the total market value remains unchanged; when the coin price rises, the number of coins in the position decreases, but because the unit price increases, the total market value stays the same. This is the mathematical logic behind crypto-asset-based one-to-one short contracts.
Risk-Free Arbitrage with One-to-One Shorts: 7% Annualized Funding Rate Yield
Suppose you buy $100,000 worth of Bitcoin spot with U, and simultaneously open a one-to-one crypto-asset-based short contract. Regardless of market fluctuations, your total assets are always locked at the equivalent of $100,000 U. In this state, you bear no directional price risk.
But here’s a key mechanism most traders overlook: the funding rate for Bitcoin contracts is mostly positive. Short contracts continuously collect this funding fee, yielding about 7% annually. In other words, you can lock in risk-free, steady passive income of around 7% per year. This is the true definition of “risk-free arbitrage”—no directional risk, purely profiting from market structural mechanics.
The advantage of this strategy is that executing simple arbitrage trades can outperform most stock investors’ annual returns. This is not an exaggeration but an objective conclusion based on market data.
Hidden Advantage of Adding to Your Position: Buying More Coins at Lower Prices
Now, let’s look at the margin mechanism of crypto-asset-based one-to-one long contracts. Margins are denominated in coins and calculated based on the U value at opening, but fluctuations in coin price do not directly affect the margin amount or liquidation price.
A crypto-asset-based one-to-one long contract will trigger liquidation if the coin price drops by 50%. Suppose you buy 10,000 coins with $10,000 U and open a position; when the coin price approaches a 50% decline, the system will require you to add margin. At this point, you can use your reserved $10,000 to buy an additional 20,000 coins to top up—this is exactly the lowest price point.
This reveals a huge advantage: when the coin price is extremely low, you can buy twice as many coins with the same U. If you top up and hold 30,000 coins, as long as the coin rebounds to about 67% of the opening price, you can break even. The original 10,000 coins already lost $5,000 U when the price fell 50%, but the additional 20,000 coins acquired through topping up will generate greater gains upon rebound.
The Threefold Short Hedging Strategy: Ample Safety Margin
High-leverage contracts require more sophisticated topping-up strategies. Take a crypto-asset-based 3x short as an example: suppose you buy 20,000 coins with $20,000 U, with 10,000 coins used to open the 3x short. When the coin price rises 50% approaching liquidation, the system asks for margin top-up.
At this point, you use your reserved 10,000 coins to top up. Since the coin price has increased, these 10,000 coins are now worth $15,000 U, but the top-up only requires the value of $10,000 U in coins. The advantage of this mechanism is that, with all 10,000 coins serving as collateral, the liquidation price in a U-based contract is much lower, providing a larger safety margin.
In high-leverage scenarios, the topping-up logic leverages the appreciation of the spot holdings—using fewer coins to meet margin requirements—thus creating a bigger risk buffer.
The Golden Rule of Crypto-Asset Contracts: Low Leverage Is the Best Choice
All advantages of crypto-asset-based contracts are built on low leverage. To truly leverage the mechanism’s benefits, you should operate with positions of only 1x to 3x. Higher leverage amplifies the risks associated with these mechanisms, negating the advantages of low leverage.
Understanding the core logic of crypto-asset-based contracts—innate long bias, the low-price advantage of topping up, and risk-free funding rate profits—can help you find real certainty in contract trading. Remember, crypto-asset-based contracts are not designed for high-leverage gains but for stable asset growth through mechanism advantages under controlled risk.