2026-02-10 11:07:02

$PI I want to ask, are the π on the exchange and the mined π the same?

PI-0,23%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

Reward
like
11
Repost
Share

Comment

Add a comment

MyGoodnessGracious

· 02-10 13:37

It's different; we dug up 314159 dollars.

View OriginalReply1

小龙7757

· 02-10 13:30

2026 Go Go Go 👊

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-215ca64c

· 02-10 13:22

Exactly the same, it seems that 0.01 is the true value return! Releasing so many tokens every day requires the market to absorb them—who will take on the responsibility?

View OriginalReply0

Only1ULeft

· 02-10 13:14

No, the exchange's coins are cheap, far less noble than the coins in my phone. The coins in my phone are mined using electricity from a prestigious national grid, including nuclear, wind, solar, hydro, and coal power. How can the fly-by-night Pi coins on the exchange compare? What are they even comparable to?

View OriginalReply2

PiHero

· 02-10 12:27

New Year Wealth Explosion 🤑

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-cf9b3338

· 02-10 12:20

How do you assign gender? The ones in the office are exactly the same as the ones dug out from the phone.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-fa0357c8

· 02-10 12:18

They're different; one is mined with a mobile phone, and the other is mined from a mine.

View OriginalReply1

GateUser-e84a81b7

· 02-10 11:47

2026 Go Go Go 👊

View OriginalReply0

PumpLatinLamp

· 02-10 11:32

Are you trying to say that the China region is mined from the sky, while other fools are mining with their phones? One is 310,000 and the other is 0.138, haha. Are they the same? Go home, prop up your pillow, and dream of everything...

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-b5c28adf

· 02-10 11:13

If you listen to Lao Si, it's the same; if you listen to those hype streamers, it's different.

View OriginalReply4