Why do so-called "experts" struggle to outperform regular market participants if they truly possess superior understanding?

Here's what the market really teaches us: information asymmetry is where money gets made. If economists and financial advisors genuinely grasped market dynamics and economic data better than everyone else, their track records should speak volumes. Yet most don't.

The gap between claimed expertise and actual wealth accumulation tells the story. In crypto markets especially, we've seen this play out countless times—analysts missing major moves, institutions getting caught off-guard, self-proclaimed gurus getting liquidated.

The uncomfortable reality? Information advantage doesn't automatically equal trading edge. Timing matters. Psychology matters. Execution matters. And sometimes, the unpredictable nature of markets humbles even the most credentialed voices.

This doesn't mean expertise is worthless. But it does mean blind trust in "expert consensus" is a dangerous game. The market rewards independent thinking and adaptive strategies far more than credentials.