2026-01-19 05:38:57

Major move in $USELESS: A whale just accumulated $49.68K worth of tokens at a $78.92M market cap. This kind of significant buy-in from large holders often signals confidence in the project. Worth keeping an eye on whether this triggers broader accumulation patterns or remains an isolated move.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

0xSunnyDay

· 01-22 04:28

Whales are on a buying spree again, this time it's $USELESS... well, isn't that name a bit funny? Haha

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHarvester

· 01-21 17:02

49.68K buy-in? Although this number looks large, in a 78.92M market cap, honestly, it's not that scary. It seems we need to see if more whales follow suit later on...

View OriginalReply0

GasGuru

· 01-19 06:09

Even the big whales are starting to hoard. Is there really a chance with this thing?

View OriginalReply0

MetaMisery

· 01-19 05:58

Whales are pouring in money, but this thing is called USELESS... Should I believe it or just laugh?

View OriginalReply0

Frontrunner

· 01-19 05:55

The whales are dumping again. This time, it's unclear whether it's genuine conviction or just a shakeout...

View OriginalReply0

AllInDaddy

· 01-19 05:51

Are the whales entering the market? Then it depends on whether others follow suit later; otherwise, it's just a lonely buy-in.

View OriginalReply0

TokenTaxonomist

· 01-19 05:40

ngl $49.68k at this cap is basically whale sneeze territory... statistically speaking, data suggests this might just be noise unless we see actual volume follow-through. let me pull up my spreadsheet to cross-reference historical accumulation patterns because one buy doesn't exactly scream "confidence" to me. taxonomically incorrect to assume isolated whale moves signal broader trend shifts, tbh.

Reply0