Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Having navigated the blockchain space for years, the biggest regret is seeing some projects holding core technologies but failing to overcome the hurdle of commercial implementation. DUSK is a typical example—claiming to be privacy-compliant and aiming to make a mark in the RWA track, yet on-chain data has long revealed the true situation clearly.
Data from the end of last year shows that the DUSK mainnet has surpassed a block height of 109,000. The average block time of 2 seconds is technically no problem, but what about the block utilization rate—it's ridiculously low. Over 70% of blocks contain fewer than 2 transactions, often resulting in consecutive empty blocks. The daily transaction volume barely exceeds 1,000, which is hardly comparable to mainstream public chains. The total daily active addresses on the network are fewer than 80, even after excluding a large number of project team wallets; actual user participation is essentially zero. Compared to a project focused on institutional-grade financial infrastructure, these numbers are almost fatal.
Liquidity issues have yet to be resolved. Major data platforms cannot find independent TVL for DUSK. The trading pairs on a leading DEX are locked in at around $270,000, and they rely on extremely high APYs like 128% to attract users, which precisely indicates how fragile the liquidity pools are. The DuskEVM mainnet launch has repeatedly been postponed, and aside from the block explorer, there are almost no ecological applications on the testnet. The so-called ecosystem projects haven't taken off either, making it impossible to support normal trading demand.
The staking aspect is also vague. The threshold of 1,000 DUSK seems reasonable, but the official stance on yields has been ambiguous—only mentioning "geometric decay release," combined with a 4.8-hour lock-up period, making it hardly attractive. Competitors outside are not idle—Polygon CDK, Oasis Network, and others are leading in ecosystem maturity and resource integration. After so many years of development, the results DUSK has delivered are truly disappointing.
In short, although privacy compliance is a selling point for this project, without real ecosystem applications to support it, this selling point is just superficial. If they don't accelerate the mainnet launch and develop real RWA scenarios, no matter how advanced the technology is, they will be eliminated by the market.
---
Another project ruined by technical self-indulgence, what a pity.
---
128% APY can't even save it, what does that indicate?
---
Privacy + compliance sound good, but the trading volume can't even break a thousand transactions, who would buy that?
---
80 active addresses... I'm speechless.
---
DuskEVM has been postponed so many times, I really can't wait any longer.
---
Competitors are already up and running, DUSK is still just talking big.
---
Summarized as flashy but superficial, no matter how advanced the technology, it can't save the fate of having no ecosystem.
---
With only $270,000 in liquidity, relying on ultra-high APY to attract users—do they not realize how fragile this ecosystem is?
---
A 4.8-hour lock-up period plus obscured yields—this staking design is truly outrageous.
---
Repeated delays in mainnet launch, yet still talking about the RWA track.
---
The fact that they can present data like 70% empty blocks shows the project team hasn't even figured out how to spin it.
---
Another project with a technical ceiling and an application floor, common everywhere
---
128% APY but still can't attract liquidity? That's ridiculous, it shows no one trusts it
---
The gap between the RWA dream and the reality of thousands of daily transactions is really huge
---
Continuous empty blocks, isn't this just a crazy waste of block space?
---
Privacy compliance sounds high-end, but the ecosystem is zero, just talk on paper
---
So many mainnet delays, yet it’s still alive, as long as the token price doesn’t crash
---
Polygon and Oasis are both competing, what has DUSK been holding back all these years?
---
Locking 1000 DUSK for 4.8 hours to earn what? It’s not as stable as a fixed deposit
---
Can’t find TVL, is it really none or just deliberately hidden?
---
No matter how advanced the technology is, if no one uses it, it’s useless, that’s DUSK’s fate
70% empty blocks? Less than 80 daily active users? And they still dare to call it institutional-grade infrastructure—laughable.
---
128% APY still can't attract people? What does that mean? It means this pool has been rotten for a long time.
---
Privacy compliance sounds very impressive, but no one actually uses it, which is quite embarrassing.
---
Over a hundred thousand block heights only yield eighty active addresses, which is really a bit ironic.
---
A project focusing on institutional financial infrastructure, yet its liquidity is even worse than some small coins. Truly remarkable.
---
Polygon and Oasis have long mastered the RWA sector. Is it a bit late for DUSK to wake up now?
---
Stop always shouting about advanced technology; ecosystem is the key. A chain without users is just a zombie chain.
---
The phrase "flower fist embroidery legs" is used perfectly. No matter how beautiful the technical specifications are written, they are useless.
---
The 4.8-hour staking lock-up period is still vague. No wonder no one comes. How does that compare?
---
On-chain data tells the truth. 70% of blocks contain fewer than 2 transactions, which already explains a lot.